Hiring 200 more police officers next year may not be enough to keep pace with attrition, but it’s the best City Hall can do and still keep its hands out of taxpayers’ pockets, Mayor Daley said Tuesday.
“I need a thousand. Make it 10,000. I mean — everything is not enough. The Park District, the schools — even your family. . . . You don’t have enough. But do taxpayers have enough money to pay more taxes? Do they? That’s the question,” Daley said.
“Do they have more money to pay taxes — local, state and federal taxes? Do they have more money to pay fees? I doubt it. I think America’s families and individuals are suffering from the economy. . . . You have to do more with less. And you have to have fiscal restraint, which is hard to do.”
Because Daley has just been the very picture of fiscal restraint for the past 20 years, after burning through all the city "reserves," selling Lincoln Park land to connected developers for $1, fencing everything in wrought iron, putting in flower boxes that seriously impact citizen safety and hinder emergency responses, the list is endless. Oh yeah, and standing aside as the aldercreatures vote themselves a 6% raise, gave their staff a 5% raise, increased the "discretionary" funds (legalized bribes) to something like $1.3 million per aldercreature. Then retire, because you've drained the tub.
And it isn't even going to make a dent:
Fraternal Order of Police President Mark Donahue said the two new classes will not be enough to keep pace with the “natural rate of attrition” that prompted 358 officers to retire during the first six months of this year. At least 116 more officers have signed up to retire next year, taking advantage of Daley’s offer to retire at 55 with premium health benefits.
The movie "Field of Dreams" had a line in it that has stuck with us through the years. Burt Lancaster as Dr. Archibald "Moonlight" Graham said:
- "You know we just don't recognize the most significant moments of our lives while they're happening."
Unfortunately, we think we recognize this one coming.
Labels: city politics, department issues