Use Your Eyes
A couple of commentators took issue with our contention yesterday that the Wisconsin shooter wasn't actually a female as the media reported. The pearl-clutchers were offended that we would dare to make such an accusation in the face of media reports to the contrary. Well, let's take a look at it:
- we were trained observers for nearly three decades and we recognize patterns;
- we don't trust a word the media says;
- we have photos and the manifesto from "her" social media sites via third parties and while we won't post them (because Google would shut us down if we did), they're enough to make us question any story being pushed by the media - "her" online handle was "crossixir" which might be a clue - if "she" wasn't full on trans, "she" was a cross dresser on the verge;
- we recognize that Madison, Wisconsin is a hotbed of lib-tarded alphabet person advocacy and they'd never left the truth get in the way of a narrative....or concealing the truth;
And finally, how do you tell everyone the shooter is trans without telling everyone the shooter is trans? You let the chief of police have a press conference:
The police chief investigating Monday’s deadly Wisconsin Christian school shooting is adamant that the 15-year-old killer’s gender identity isn’t “important at all.”
Madison Police Chief Shon Barnes dismissed concerns about Natalie “Samantha” Rupnow’s identity when asked about early rumors that she was possibly transgender.
“I don’t know whether Natalie was transgender or not. And, quite frankly, I don’t think that’s important at all,” Barnes said of Rupnow, who died of a self-inflicted gunshot wound after killing a teacher and a student.
“I don’t think whatever happened today has anything to do with how she or he or they may want to identify,” he stated.
Except that it has a massive bearing on any legit investigation, including if any drugs, hormone blockers, anti-depressants, etc might have influenced the murderous behavior see in so many recent shootings.
By the way, was anyone else amazed at the stupidity coming out of the White House today? Where Biden called for an "assault weapons ban" in a shooting where the killer used a pistol? And then (this really gets us) demands people face the full penalty of law when violating weapon laws, after he just pardoned his own son for not following weapon laws?
Labels: crime, scc responds
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home