Hey Lefty? Just for You
Just a quick little 5 minute Internet search:
- "The United States needs to lose the war in Iraq as soon as possible. Even more urgently, the whole world needs the United States to lose the war in Iraq. What is at stake now is the way we run the world for the next generation or more, and really bad things will happen if we get it wrong.” - Gwynne Dyer, leftist author
- Biden says we must win the war. This is precisely wrong. The United States must learn to lose this war - Jonathan Schell, AlterNet.com
- The United States has lost the war in Iraq, and that's a good thing. - Robert Jensen, college professor and author
So all of the above (and tens of thousands more leftists) are actively cheering for a US defeat and the only way to defeat is more dead soldiers - or is that leap a little much for you? Surf any of the threads at Daily Kos or the Democratic Underground. Kos himself even said "Screw 'em" when four US citizens we're killed, burned, hacked to pieces and hanged from a bridge. They literally cheer for more deaths and celebrate "milestones" of 2,000 deaths and 2,500 deaths, belittling everything our military has done. And how about this sign in San Francisco this past summer?
You and your hippie ilk want to relive Vietnam and drag this country backwards into the cesspool that was the 60's and 70's, but don't question your patriotism?
You and your hippie ilk want to relive Vietnam and drag this country backwards into the cesspool that was the 60's and 70's, but don't question your patriotism?
posted by SCC at 12:01 AM
9 Comments:
So since he's a veteran, he's immune from criticism? Thanks for proving Ann Coulter's argument again.
Get a clue, Lefty.
Northside thrives on the vicious juvenile attacks.
If a jealous frustrated psychopath can't attack him as an outstanding copper and must resort to vile insults, Northern must have done something right.
Knowing the man, he's probably laughing his ass off.
hey im leftyhanded. woot!!! and my monkey and me love Ann Coulter. She is insane when she opens her mouth but wow is she hot to look at with the volume turned down.
S.C.C. + Coulter = N.A.Z.I. P.U.S.S.Y.
lefty rules
SCC drools
word!
Bwahahahaha! What complete and utter bullshit! Cite these alleged violations of Internation Law and Treaties. And your claims of "Our Victims?" Grow up. Evidently, you are another "blame America first" type. The good done by America far outweighs any unintentional failings. And quoting Chomsky? What about the 17 UN resolutions and the Joint Resolution of the United States Congress? Your comprehension of Internation Law is like our comprehension of how to perform open heart surgery - non existent.
You are living in a fantasy land friend. Open your eyes.
(1) A defenseless 3rd world country with the second biggest army under arms in the middle east (second to Iran). A country that had been launching missles at US planes for 11 years, importing arms from China, Russia and France in defiance of a UN Arms ban. A country that slaughtered the Kurds, Marsh Arabs within it's own borders and sponsered "palestinian" suicide bombers with reward money. It's called a "threat to our National interests." All countries operate in their own National interests, some by arming dictators and bying their oil.
(2) Um, how did a country stripped of the ability to sell oil except for food and medicine manage to acquire close to $18 billion dollars for tanks, missles, bullets, guns, the second largest army, etc etc? Why, through bribes, payoffs, blackmail and countries willing to look the other way for cheap oil! Imagine that.
(3) Kuwait was demanding answers for thousands of it's citizens still missing after 11 years. But if you read the 17 UN resolutions and the established policy of "regime change" (official policy of the CLINTON administration, nothing in any of these claims "imminent threat." And neither did Bush in his State of the Union. Go look it up - Your use of the words "Imminent Threat" betray you as a kool-aid drinking leftist of the highest order - we spanked Lefty with it many times.
(4) Because (A) he was buying off every country and every UN inspection team? Why rock the boat was their attitude. And (B) the inspection schedule was knows DAYS ahead of time. He move stuff around. Remember the truck traffic captured Generals have been telling the US about? Moving stuff to Bekka and Russia? If you read anything but the main stream media and the Daily Kos for your info, you'd be amazed at what's public knowledge. How about the 500 shells just discovered? Inert or now THEY WERE NEVER DECLARED AND ARE A MATERIAL BREACH.
Your 100,000 dead Iraqi's is another horseshit number. The Lancet chose a number between 20,000 and 180,000 as a "median." It's still under 35,000 that have been killed by IRAQI and foreign terrorists, not Americans. And you'd still prefer 50 million Iraqi's and Afghani's living under tyrants and clerics planning the next big thing?
As to the UN, why is it everywhere they go, child prostitution rings seem to pop up? Why do bribes for oil, food and shelter seem to be the norm? Why does every single UN mission without American troops seem to bog down and lead to further slaughter? Or don't you remember Serbia, Darfur, Lebanon, etc.?
The US is an outlaw state? OK, now you've crossed intothe realm of stupidity. We can't believe we've waster this much time explaining the world to a softball like yourself. Lefty? This is your support? Our opinion of you has sunken - you used to be so much smarter.
All of you need editing. The last succinct post on this was the original one.
SCC - I read those articles, and they don't say what you claim. They're saying the US should bring our troops home safely.
The sign in the picture is completely inexcusable - if that's anyone on the left, then I'm disgusted. But is it? Who is actually carrying that sign? The sign is more consistent with the messages of right-winger Fred Phelps than anything a Democrat said. Were there interviews with the sign-kooks, or did you just assume they're on the left because it's in SF? Right-wing kooks can travel too.
According to this, he's a Leninist. Attaching a Leninist to the mainstream American left makes as much sense as attaching the American Nazi Party to the mainstream American right. I don't think you want to claim them, do you? (After reading some of the outright racist comments that you're having to delete, I could make a pretty well-supported argument.) I'll be a kind liberal and not claim you're responsible for those.
Sorry, SCC, but your BS on this one is still stuck to your own shoes. I know, I know, "no, man, you're full of it blah blah blah."
<< Home