Another?
- A man was seriously wounded Saturday afternoon in a police-involved shooting on the Far South Side in the city's Washington Heights neighborhood, authorities said.
The shooting happened about 1:30 p.m. in the 1000 block of West 103rd Place, according to Chicago Fire Department Media information. Police fired on someone and hit them, according to Larry Merritt, a spokesman for the Independent Police Review Authority, which investigates police-involved shootings.
One person was taken in serious to critical condition to Advocate Christ Medical Center in Oak Lawn, according to fire officials. The man was in surgery Saturday night, according to a police statement.
Gun recovered, good guys go home, bad guy to jail. But of course, the usual suspects are spouting off their ghetto law degrees to the media, who gleefully print it.
Labels: shooting
posted by SCC at 1:01 AM
13 Comments:
From the article: "For the most part, police did not engage with the residents. But one officer, carrying a large gun, turned slowly toward a woman who told him not to shoot her car and said, “Really? Really?”
Tribune, when you say "a large gun" don't you mean "assault rifle"? After all, that's the term you use for any black gun larger than a pistol. This is very sloppy copy editing, how can you support the liberal narrative if you don't use the proper knee-jerk buzzwords?
The public wants every police officer to be armed with a Tazer. Only supervisors may carry firearms.
Did anyone see when the bias news reporter was interviewing one of the usual "witnesses", the mush stated that the deseased altar boy had "7 wollet boons." WTF. Wollet boons??? Do you mean bullet wounds. Mama always said, stupid is as stupid does.
Do what I do - whenever I see the BS I change the channel or skip to the sports section . I don't LET all those who are FOS have 1 second of my time . Ignore and be happy .
Ballerina wants more transparency in Chicago police department , wasn't he the one that paid millions yo hide video from citizens of Chicago will some millionaire please pay for body cams to be worn by Rahm and his bodyguards and the fifty alderman , this would be real transparency in city government .
Ghetto law degree?
rahm calling for immediate changes in how police respond to those with mental health problems.
First off, a person with mental health issues can kill me.
Second, I am not a trained phsycologist, psychiatrists, or social worker.
Third, you rahm, will never ever provide anywhere near the type of training that would be required to have an impact with mentally unstable individuals. Your call for traing and immediate changes are pure political theater while you sun in Cuba.
Fourth, if by some miracle you provide this traing or claim we have been trained to a level that we are proficient in more advanced mental health intervention I want to be compensated accordingly.
Fifth and finally rahm, do the right thing and resign.
Anonymous said...
Did anyone see when the bias news reporter was interviewing one of the usual "witnesses", the mush stated that the deseased altar boy had "7 wollet boons." WTF. Wollet boons??? Do you mean bullet wounds. Mama always said, stupid is as stupid does.
12/27/2015 09:12:00 AM
"bias" instead of "biased?"
"deseased" instead of "deceased?"
I won't even address your punctuation errors. Not all stupid people are altar boys.
water guns
New dealing with mental health order and training will be soon. But no mention of the city , county , and State cutting the budget for mental health
CPD should give us better training. We don't have any training.
The Chicago Fibune yet again energetically
barks up the wrong fucking tree:
"Chicago's next top cop
faces daunting to-do list"
Of course we read it with a
jaundiced and baleful eye...
This:
"Law enforcement experts (And who would
be more "expert" than the 12+ feet and
500+ lbs of Po-leece opening the front doors
of that squad and planting those heavy, hard-soled boondocker
boots on the pavement to trudge to where monsters abide?) say
the new top cop should have a strong personality, understand
police work and it's dangerous nature, (Ain't happening. The new
top cop would be tagged as a "Warrior Cop") and recognize past abuses..."
(Nothing like the Perpetual Grievance Industrial Complex being given
carte blanche to finally achieve a full measure of "revenge" against The Police.)
It gets REALLY amusing...
"And if Chicago is to realize true change, (as long as it's only Coppers
who are hobbled/harmed in the change process) they say, it's important that
the person brought in have a large measure of independence from the mayor...
(Read as mayor, alderfools, store-front clergy, activists, media talking heads etc.)
Real thigh-slapper, right?
This little golden nugget:
"Two senior Emanuel administration officials conceded there is
no doubt the mayor calls his top deputies often, (Stay on top of
this here spin or else?) but they challenged the assertion that he
micromanaged the Police Department."
More m/fers who can see sounds and hear colors, eh?
Chicago is overrun with 'em...
Utter Nonsense:
"Experts say (Them again? WHO THEE FUCK are these
alleged experts?) some departments are looking to move
away from old-school "warrior" approach and toward a "guardian"
model with deeper, more tangible partnerships with communities..."
When the bigger, stronger, smarter, more vicious, ruthless and MOBILE
urban criminal decides to be kinder, gentler and pinky-swears to play by the rules...
And this:
"What the politicians rarely understand is what it takes to completely transform an
intrasigent, warrior, predator police department..."
"The Chicago Police Department is as deeply steeped in warrior policing and
circle-the-wagons policing as any I have seen."
Above quotes courtesy of Connie Rice, "...a longtime civil rights attorney
and (Police?) department critic who was asked to help lead the Los Angeles
reform efforts."
They have no real answers to address the crime and violence
in Chicago so they're reduced to "reforming" The Police to make
it look as if they're doing something.
Apologies for the length,
SCC...
Sometimes brevity and context are at odds.
Thanks for what you do.
Anonymous Anonymous said...
Did anyone see when the bias news reporter was interviewing one of the usual "witnesses", the mush stated that the deseased altar boy had "7 wollet boons." WTF. Wollet boons??? Do you mean bullet wounds. Mama always said, stupid is as stupid does.
12/27/2015 09:12:00 AM
I couldn't believe it, so I reversed the dvr. Yup, not bullet wounds, but wullet boons. Btw, that was the mother.
Post a Comment
<< Home