Is Crimesha in Trouble?

Usually, this would be an investigation working its way up the ladder....but to what end now?

• The woman who served as Kim Foxx’s top assistant in the Cook County State’s Attorney’s Office must sit for an under-oath deposition to explain why her office decided not to object to people convicted of murder receiving certificates of innocence even though Foxx personally believed some of the recipients were guilty.

  Foxx herself gave a sworn deposition in April and made the stunning revelation that she personally believed two exonerated men whose certificates of innocence were not opposed by her administration were, in fact, guilty of “a heinous act of murder.”

  But during her deposition, Foxx often said she did not know the details of exoneration cases or how her office investigated and determined whether to challenge certificates of innocence, legal documents that mean an exonerated person is actually innocent of a crime. Those matters, Foxx said, were under the purview of the office’s number-two executive, then-First Assistant Cook County State’s Attorney Risa Lanier.

That sounds like Crimesha pretty much tossed Lanier under the bus there, so Lanier has no reason to lie for Crimesha moving forward.

The trouble is, Lanier was instrumental in the deal that freed the French actor Juicy Smollet and sealed the records from public view....until the whole thing blew up all over Crimesha....like a large root beer beverage.

It isn't exactly clear what the goal of these depositions will be because it's the City of Chicago demanding sworn testimony from Lanier and how certain decisions were arrived at. It seems like it may be an effort to fight some of the "project innocence" payouts?