Chicago Misses List
- Despite the ongoing violence plaguing the city, a new report did not name Chicago as one of its most violent cities in the world.
The rankings were published by the Mexico Citizens Council for Public Security, and Caracas was named the most violent city in the world for 2015. The Venezuelan country saw nearly 4,000 homicides with more than 300,000 inhabitants, according to the report. That breaks down to 119.87 homicides per 100,000 people.
But guess who did make the list?
- Four cities in the U.S. were named on the list, St. Louis, Baltimore, Detroit, and New Orleans, respectively, according to the report.
Golly, the cities of riots, riots, Rust Belt collapse and hurricane central. Also, all run by democrats for the past fifty, sixty or more years.
Labels: crime
19 Comments:
"Chicago Misses List"
Heh...
Rahm al-Ghoul has his minions out there
feverishly working to get out in front
of Chicago rightfully landing on any
most/worst list.
This town is boned beyond salvage or care.
Police like you have no friends.
Wait a second. How did Chicago NOT make that list?
Somebody must have been paid off.
So long as Chicago has 3 million people, horrible shooters, great first responders and trauma surgeons, it's safe to say we will never be on the list. Not last year, not if there's 600 homicides this year, not from 900 homicides 20 years ago, not ever.
The cities listed usually always make it, though. And I guess if we want to feel special and included, in Chiraq, Garfield park, Chatham, and Englewood all have murder rates that rival El Salvador (or in Garfield parks case, completely dwarfs El Salvador's murder rate).
Better luck this year?
The "Mexico Citizens Council for Public Security" (like their name would be in English and not Spanish) did not name Chicago as a violent city because Chicago is a "sanctuary" city for illegals and because Chicago is a hub city for illegal narcotics. The two main reasons illegals from down south come far north.
Maybe Chicago will be on the list for 2016?
Missed it by thaat much!
The voters all failed that "which one is not the other" test in grade school, too. there is a simple common thread that ties these cities together.
Is there another common denominator that those four cities have?
Now, kees me you fool!!!!
Believe it or not there are cities in this country that are much more violent than Chicago.
Geez, arent all those run by liberals. Things that make you go hmmmm
Shitcago will make lost this year
Those cities mentioned have a large influx of Amish teens using social media. Just saying...
Martin Luther King Jr. called Chicago the most segregated city in America. Chicago hasn't had a Republican mayor in office since two years before Al Capone went to prison for tax evasion. The city votes 85% Democrat in every election. But who do hippies blame for everything wrong in Chicago? FOX News.
Don't worry after this years thug fest we will be #1 with a bullet rising! hey great idea instead of Chicago rising call it Chicago rising with a bullet pathetic what has been done to CPD, by politicians, gold star club,media,fake "men of god" etc...
look at the cities,all run by liberals,all bankrupt no wonder but surprised Chicago is not 31 yet? We are in the running, and I hope that the theory is wrong 2016 is going to be a blood bath, but don't worry you hired Mr $350.00 per hour (Is he a brain surgeon?) grandpa will have ideas as long as senility does not set in! Now you have 2 top cops raking in over a million dollars a year and they will do what again? The department cannot even get enough applicants, your mayor wants more blacks to apply,and they lowered your fire department age to 17 (LOL) years old to sit for that test! What next even though some of your 17 year olds are barely out of 8th grade in your public school system. how easy can that test be? If your an educated adult and fail the test do you jump off a bridge? Dumbing down police,dumbing down firefighters the new America liberal and democrats destroying a once proud country lets hope "make America great again" trump wins we need major changes!
There is something curious about your numbers
4K homisides for 300K inhabitants is a little over 1 per hundred
119 homicides per 100K people is a little over 1 per thousand
Hundred, thousand?
An error or some kind of shifting definition?
There is something curious about your numbers
4K homisides for 300K inhabitants is a little over 1 per hundred
119 homicides per 100K people is a little over 1 per thousand
Hundred, thousand?
An error or some kind of shifting definition?
////////////
Is this a response to my comment? If so, yes, there actually was an error. I meant Honduras, not El Salvador.
Not even honorable mention??? Sounds like someone got paid off by one of Rahms rich buddies to not include Chicago.
Post a Comment
<< Home