More Funny
This is from the Tribune at the liquor store shooting:
This is funny:
This is freaking hilarious:
Any liberals want to chime in why their sign failed?
This is funny:
This is freaking hilarious:
Any liberals want to chime in why their sign failed?
Labels: gun issues
posted by SCC at 12:33 AM
107 Comments:
I always get a warm fuzzy feeling when I enter a "Gun Free" zone. The only thing I have to worry about then is getting shot by a thug, a suicidal kid that stopped taking his Ritalin, a psycho, or a peace-loving Muslim jihadist.
because liberals are totally full of shit
Sign wasn't big enough..
NYPD Coverage:
CLICK HERE
Good question, Under (430 ILCS 66/65) which is the concealed carry act regulating the signs etc. It states in Section 65:
Sec. 65. Prohibited areas.
(a) A licensee under this Act shall not knowingly carry a firearm on or into:...so on so on
What this says is that the holder of a CCL under 430 ILCS 66/65 and ONLY those holders are subject to the GFZ prohibition brought on by the posting of the sign.
It does not have any control over active peace officers or retired officers under HR-218/LEOSA, OR unlicensed holders aka Bad guys and I am sure the deceased were not licensed.......
Scc, duh
The sticker was supposed to be on the left hand side of the window to be effective. It doesn't deter criminals having guns placed on the right side
Those assholes who got capped are products of liberalism at its best... My only regret is, I could not put an insurance policy on them
The scumbag robbers probably didn't see the "no guns" sign otherwise they would have went and robbed a store that allowed them to carry their guns inside. Violating the "no guns" sticker is a very serious matter to a criminal.
I didn't catch that. HAHAHA!
SCC this is O.T. but definitely "more funny." The new order on the ISR is out and with a reference that questions regarding it should e-mailed to askisr@chicagopolice.org...askisr... as in... ass kisser! You couldn't make this shit up. So in the interest of helping the other elements of the department, let's provide some other important e-mail addresses: Office of the Superintendent contact jhnzfkd@chicagopolice.org; IPRA contact brnacop@chicagopolice.org; To check on your clout contact neepds@chicagopolice.org; Fleet Management contact hupty@chicagopolice.org; Detective Division contact ugtnthnkd@chicagopolice.org; Patrol Division contact dllgaf@chicagopolice.org; Gary McCarthy contact naldit@chicagopolice.org...
I invite the loyal followers to complete the list for our new and improved department!
Just another day at work, standing next to a couple of dead mutts!
Maybe the "no guns" sign should be bigger?
Glad to see no guns were used inside the store. People could have been hurt if they brought guns into this gun free zone.
The sign did not fail. These two "children" are products of the Chitcago school system. Not only are they so poorly educated that they are illiterate, but they do not even understand ideograms. They were not taught that a red circle and slash mean NO. They were never taught what NO means either. They did not even know that they are not allowed to buy booze until they are 21. How would they ever know that they need to be 21 and have a FOID Card to possess a handgun?
That is the only explanation. Otherwise the No Guns sign would have worked.
No Guns signs are magical and infallible. They always work!
And that is the reason those two innocent young children should be still alive.
The sticker is bs. A conceal carry permit holder is allowed 3 warnings if caught with a concealed firearm in a location posting the bs sticker. At the time of your 3rd warning you loose your permit. I wouldn't worry until after my 1st warning.
The evil racist, capitalists gunned down two poor innocent children and you are making fun of the signs?
Those signs should have kept those misguided tykes safe! The evil profiteering parasite business owners family never should have been allowed to possess guns in any store protected by Gun Free Zone signs.
/sarc
The sign I prefer is ...
For the safety of our employees and customers some of our staff carry concealed firearms. Have a nice day :-)
Because dumbfuck can't read?
Oh my. Those bad boys disregarded the sign. I hope Rahm doesn't find out. He will have a hissy-fit.
Now, kees me you fool!!!!
can't the liberal/progressive democrats pass a law making it illegal to break the law?
It didn't fail. The offenders thought the people inside would not be armed. They believed the sign . They must have been liberals too.
Ha ha ha ha!!!! Thank you SCC this is priceless. Fuck I love this site.
I'm not a PO and I come to this blog site every morning to get the real scoop. Thank you SCC for making my (indefinite, unfotunate, longer than I ever anticipated) stay in Chicago more bearable.
Hey wait a minute...do you mean to tell me that the liquor sto had a NO GUN sign affixed to the window of the store in an effort to prevent a gun-wielding person from entering and they did it anyways? How can that be if the sign was clearly posted? I'm confused. It's like you're saying they either didn't see the sign or didn't obey it.
CLTV reporting that first ten days of 2016 in Chicago 110 shot & 17 kilt. Now hold me down on reports...
how does a 15 and 17 year old cps student buy a gun in Chicago , Illinois
toughest gun laws in the USA?
Sign is too small and they didn't have anyone at the door verbally admonishing every customer.
Absolutely no returns on items without receipt & All shoplifters will be prosecuted to the full extent of the law!
At least one town has the little "No Beretta 92" stickers inside their ambulances, on the inside of the back door.
What the...uh...
It was not exactly the right size? I was told signs save lives. I feel ripped!
We all know that the sign should have been outside where the Thugs could see and know not to go in with a pistol. Al Sharpton would say how where they supposed to know by the time these two upstanding young men understood this they where dead.
That sign means no guns allowed, Those two robbers were warned,
...and the bars on every single window...need to have the rent-a-dog guy drop one off every night at closing time...
Reminds me of a talk-show comment by conservative Walter Williams.
"I'm old and I'm tired and my back bothers me. I don't want to live someplace where, every time I park my car, I have to take out the engine and bring it in the house with me for safekeeping..."
Those youf's were probably not finished schoolin yet so they didn't realize that sign meant no guns
Comedy in the places one would least expect it. Good catch!!!
What news rag was that reporter with the No Guns patch on his back with?
Those signs are the very definition of stupid.
If you're a responsible citizen, have a gun and can potentially stop criminals, do not come in and spend your money here. On the other hand, if you're a criminal or a psycho with a gun who disregards signs, welcome!
Anonymous said...
The sticker is bs. A conceal carry permit holder is allowed 3 warnings if caught with a concealed firearm in a location posting the bs sticker. At the time of your 3rd warning you loose your permit. I wouldn't worry until after my 1st warning.
1/12/2016 04:59:00 AM
This is just plain wrong. I hope this was not a copper who wrote this.
"how does a 15 and 17 year old cps student buy a gun in Chicago , Illinois
toughest gun laws in the USA?" According to our beloved president, it's Indiana's fault! Youts prolly had frens and homies who travel to Gary every so often. Where's the border patrol when you need 'em?
I thought it was illegal in Illinois to BAIT predators.
Didn't say, Please ???
Yeah, "liberals" are the problem. Remember that liberals are the ones that ensure you had a police union, a pension, etc. So, may you should do a little reflection on your dumb "liberal" bashing.
Clean up on isle four...
Most important question of this post, did the youths receive their stop receipts and was the ISR's completed at the end of the tour....?
Think my numbers for the fire department just went up
The store clerk who shot them is an ex Iraqi soldier. He performed cool under pressure. I tell you, only these Arabs are brave enough to own liquor stores and grocery stores in the hood. To the Arabs, the hood is nothing from what they are used to in their home countries.
No Gun sign on right door, = Folks
No Gun sign on left door, = People
'Splains it all!
"A man gotta do somethin' for a livin'."
Liquor store robbers.
"Dyin' ain't much of a livin'."
Josie Wales
Those stickers should be put on the safe passage signs as well.
Anonymous Grabowski said...
I always get a warm fuzzy feeling when I enter a "Gun Free" zone. The only thing I have to worry about then is getting shot by a thug, a suicidal kid that stopped taking his Ritalin, a psycho, or a peace-loving Muslim jihadist.
1/12/2016 01:07:00 AM
I get a warm, fuzzy feeling, too. As a retired female po, I know that the LAST thing anyone will expect inside one of these locations is me, meeting their attack with my firearm.
Not a PO here again. Shouldn't the two guys who were shot and killed be arrested sentenced and fined post mortum for breaking the no guns ordinance? Their families can pay their fines for them. Rahm, don't be a pussy. Come out strong against these guys.. Make an example out of THEM for once. Take the spotlight off the police once in a while at least.
Officers, this is more reason for you to not only staying fetal, you should become embryonic. Don't waste your lives and careers for Rahms sake. He's a snake that will eat you alive given the chance. Your just a political pawn in his fucked up world.
So we have over 100 people shot in the first 11 days of the year. Any relation there to the number of street stops?
It's like the other day -- SCC I commend you for your response when the citizen said to the police at the crime scene "Where were y'all at" and SCC's comeback was along the lines of, where were the parents at who raised these young men?.
Let the citizens of the hood have the police that they want and they will get the neighborhood they deserve. Yes black lives do matter. Let's see the black community start doing something to save their own young and old folks and peoples from themselves.
We the police are just pawns in a dirty game of political chess. When crime is low (or when stats are manipulated), the politicians (ie the mayor) take credit for "implementing new strategies" to reduce crime. when it is politically expedient or crime is up, the police officer will be sacrificed to ensure the "king" survives. now that the aclu is playing the mayor in this game of chess, it will be harder to sacrifice the police because the rules of engagement have changed (ISRs). As "de-policing" takes effect, watch the crime rates go up, and we the police can say that's not our fault. We can't be everywhere especially since Rahm won't hire more police officers. We can't solve the problems of a broken-down, multi-generational social system. We fight crime and that's it. Don't be a pawn in the politicians' dirty game. Go home safe.
CLTV reporting that the first eleven days of 2016 in Chicago, 125 shot & 20 kilt. I'm still down on reports...
Curious, anyone know how many shots were fired into the robbers?
Since momma ain't sayin nuffin and no word from the media, wouldn't Faheed be accountable if he was over his limit?
Is Jessie, Sharptoon, Phfegar and the #BowelMovementMatter busy making picket signs and awaiting a break in the deep freeze?
Commander Buslik is gone from 014.
He is now going to be the liaison between the department and the DOJ.
Many of his Minions were seen at Starbucks this morning screaming and crying as they attempted to bring as many lattes and brownies to him in an attempt to suck up and be taken down to 35th Street with the great leader.
The clerk did not attempt to de-escalate the situation. The clerk is racist.
Off topic:
Can we please see the merit list of the current Sergeant class, we know the 13 but haven't seen the other 17.
Still can't believe these idiots tried to stick up a liquor store in the hood. Brilliant idea from some aspiring rocket scientists. Im surprised the family isn't complaing about the lack of warning shots, signage warning about armed employees....
OT --
Genuinely stupid, uninformed article by some nobody here. Area press is picking it up all over.
What kind of idiot would name Harwood Heights as the worst place to live while ignoring, say, Robbins?
The guy actually listed Riverside as a terrible place. We should drive him out there, cut him loose, and see if he dies of starvation before he walks his way out of that marvelous Frederick Law Olmsted street layout. I simply learned to navigate by the sun in getting through there.
Back in the early days, Riverside residents resisted a house numbering plan. "We already know who everybody is, and the rest we don't care about anyway." >grin<
http://www.roadsnacks.net/worst-chicago-suburbs/
"how does a 15 and 17 year old cps student buy a gun in Chicago , Illinois
toughest gun laws in the USA?"
1/12/2016 07:48:00 AM
FEDERAL AGE RESTRICTIONS
"Federal law prohibits Federal firearms licensees from selling or delivering any firearm or ammunition to any individual who the licensee knows or has reasonable cause to believe is less than 18 years of age, and, if the firearm is other than a shotgun or rifle, or ammunition for a shotgun or rifle, to any individual who the licensee knows or has reasonable cause to believe is less than 21 years of age. (18 U.S.C. 922(b)(1), 27 CFR 478.99(b)(1).)
"Ammunition interchangeable between rifles and handguns (such as .22 caliber rimfire) may be sold to an individual 18 years of age, but less than 21, if the licensee is satisfied that the ammunition is being acquired for use in a rifle.
"Additionally, it generally is unlawful for a person to transfer a handgun to a juvenile (a person less than 18 years of age) and it generally is unlawful for a juvenile to possess a handgun. Exceptions are provided for the transfer of a handgun to and possession by a juvenile for the purposes of employment, ranching, farming, target practice or hunting as provided for in 18 U.S.C. 922(x).
"Pursuant to regulations at 27 CFR 478.103, ATF distributes posters to licensed importers, manufacturers, and dealers that caution against the transfer of handguns to juveniles, as well as the possession of handguns by juveniles, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 922(x). The regulations require licensees to display the posters on their premises. Some licensees erroneously interpreted the poster to mean that they may now lawfully transfer handguns to any person over 17 years of age. Enactment of section 922(x) making it unlawful to sell handguns to juveniles (persons under 18 years of age) and for juveniles to possess handguns did not alter section 922(b)(1) of the GCA that continues to prohibit licensees from transferring handguns to persons under 21 years of age."
http://bccguns.com/gun-dealer-faqs/federal-age-restrictions.html
I have a conceal carry permit and totally ignore those "no gun" signs, unless there is a metal detector or a pat down search to enter the premises...........That is the idea behind the word "concealed". I'll take my chances with a jury rather than face some criminal who is armed and I'm not.
Wouldn't the GFZ sign technically also apply to the owner/worker too?
Lordy why did I look at the 2nd dead nutmeg's photo...
--No Cop Here
Maybe they thought it was ok since neither was carrying a Beretta Sign said no Beretta's right.
Anonymous Anonymous said...
That sign means no guns allowed, Those two robbers were warned,
1/12/2016 09:09:00 AM
They probably thought that it meant that the establishment doesn't sell guns.
Anonymous Anonymous said...
What news rag was that reporter with the No Guns patch on his back with?
1/12/2016 10:00:00 AM
Lol!
Seriously?
We can have all kinds of fun with that one...
Just find out who he/she is and put their dumb ass on blast
so if on that joyous day they get rubbed on by a member of
Dude Inc. at gunpoint, we can have a good laugh.
Police like you have no friends.
HAHAHAHA......Pork Rind display in the background is priceless
Ex-Chicago Police Sergeant's Union President John Pallohusky to be released from Tayorville State penitentiary on 26 January 2016.
He went in on 8 June 2012 and was supposed to GET 12 YEARS !!!
He will be getting out with just doing a little more than 3 YEARS AND 7 MONTHS !!!
Remember he stole over 1.1 MILLION DOLLARS of the sergeants dues.
Here is the scumbags CURRENT photo and info. in the penitentiary:
(Go to the below site and place ' Pallohusky ' in the search box.
http://www.illinois.gov/idoc/Offender/Pages/InmateSearch.aspx
From 2012:
http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2012-06-06/news/ct-met-police-officer-prison-20120606_1_sergeants-dues-john-pallohusky
The Obama Administration will go down in history internally as the Architects of Urban Anarchy and externally as the Mimes of Genocide. The world is in free fall his historically bad decisions are giving it ankle weights.
They also "card hard" - robbers must've been under 21.
Looks like these two kids wandered off their safe passage route.
The evil, racist... the only comments reported in the news were residents saying, "those people (the store owners) do not play." No one said those poor kids not even their relatives, they only said one mother cried.
I don't know if you folks back in the windy city know how bad you have it. Over 500 homicides in 2015 for a city with a population of 2.8 million (or so). The Great State of California has a population of 39 million (not counting the folks from Mexico who we have invited here, but don't count). 2014 the entire state of California had 1697 homicides.
Wow, do you feel over worked and underpaid now? I would think so.
Bring back God in public schools
Thou shall to steal
It might have sunk in and saved the future doctors from being shot dead
The store owners are hypocrites. Nobody who supports CCW should patronize that store, or any other that has anti-gun stickers on the door.
The liquor store owner isn't on the dole, so maybe the sign was just obscured by a haze of class privilege. Clearly we need to take drastic measures, maybe even go all the way with a strongly worded UN resolution condemning gun criminals as bad people who should totally be ashamed of themselves. That'll teach em!
How did this Dept have over 12,000 field interviews so far this year? That's about 11,750 more than I would have thought.
I'm surprises no one has photoshopped the picture to include graduation mortar boards lying next to the bodies.
Those are called come make me a victim sign
So long as the sign's the right size, configuration, and has the statute quoted on it it's a legal sign posted under color of law. But we all know it's absolutely worthless.
Maybe a few more of these incidents and the liberals will realize that.... naaa, never mind, I don't know what I was thinking there... Libtards will just want a bigger sign. That'll fix it - yeah.
Do we have to give the dead guys ISR receipts?
What this says is that the holder of a CCL under 430 ILCS 66/65 and ONLY those holders are subject to the GFZ prohibition brought on by the posting of the sign.
It does not have any control over active peace officers or retired officers under HR-218/LEOSA, OR unlicensed holders aka Bad guys and I am sure the deceased were not licensed.......
1/12/2016 02:23:00 AM
--------
True. But every other situation is a UUW or worse.
Man, I hate these stupid laws.
They were probably just hungry?
The ironic thing is that the only group of people that those signs have any legal meaning for are those with concealed carry licenses, who have been background checked and trained and who are not the people who are out robbing and gangbanging. They can be charged with a crime for entering such a posted establishment. No one else faces any extra legal penalties, those signs are an abomination and I hope the liquor store owners figure this out and remove it.
Dumb and dumber.
CLTV reporting that the first eleven days of 2016 in Chicago, 125 shot & 20 kilt. I'm still down on reports...
1/12/2016 12:58:00 PM
I like the nearly 2/day average. If you're getting this in January, just think what could happen when it's warm.
s said...
Yeah, "liberals" are the problem. Remember that liberals are the ones that ensure you had a police union, a pension, etc. So, may you should do a little reflection on your dumb "liberal" bashing.
1/12/2016 11:33:00 AM
So...
Isn't it the height of irony if not hypocrisy
that what you say liberals "gave" to
Policemen, those same liberals are
giddy with joy at seeing those things
being taken away?
Anything else you wanna
pat yourself on the back for?
...Bashing liberals until days get better.
Or until you're exposed and driven from
power and influence like the vermin you are.
You're a collective stink in the nostrils of
upright, law abiding people.
The sign is ONLY good to prohibit Beretta 92s. They must have held their gun up to the picture and figured it did not match.
By the way, did the company who makes the sign ever clear it with Beretta to use a likeness of their product? Did all those organizations who use that sign get an OK from Beretta to use that sign?
If I was Beretta, I would slap a HUGE lawsuit on EVERY store, building, and government organization that uses that sign. Copyright infringement, unlawful use of a likeness of a patented product without consent, etc.
Sound ridiculous? DISNEY does that all over the place if anyone uses a picture or likeness of Mickey Mouse, Donald Duck, or any other Disney character on Birthday cakes, posters, party supplies, etc.
Unauthorized use. Pay UP!
Next case.
Anonymous Anonymous said...
Anonymous Anonymous said...
What news rag was that reporter with the No Guns patch on his back with?
1/12/2016 10:00:00 AM
Lol!
Seriously?
We can have all kinds of fun with that one...
Just find out who he/she is and put their dumb ass on blast
so if on that joyous day they get rubbed on by a member of
Dude Inc. at gunpoint, we can have a good laugh.
Police like you have no friends.
1/12/2016 03:53:00 PM
Here's hoping only poster 2 is an idiot.
There is no 'no guns' sign on the guy's back. It's the decal on the clear door, showing up against the guy's clothing.
"Wouldn't the GFZ sign technically also apply to the owner/worker too?"
No. Even before concealed carry, business owners and or designated employees were allowed to have firearms at their place of business. Just as anyone could keep a firearm in their own home even if now the homeowner decided to put a no guns sign on their front door.
Yeah, "liberals" are the problem. Remember that liberals are the ones that ensure you had a police union, a pension, etc. So, may you should do a little reflection on your dumb "liberal" bashing.
1/12/2016 11:33:00 AM
I was around when the Union was formed. I don't remember any of you fighting for Police Officers rights. I remember you fighting a lot of Police Officers. I remember you bombing Police Officers, but I don't remember you helping us in any way.
Get over yourselves and your "we fight for the little guy" mentality. Look at your leaders. No paupers among them. They have all done incredibly well for themselves. You are misguided and mislead. You sir, are naïve.
CPS students....They caint read.
Here is the scumbags CURRENT photo and info. in the penitentiary:
(Go to the below site and place ' Pallohusky ' in the search box.
http://www.illinois.gov/idoc/Offender/Pages/InmateSearch.aspx
From 2012:
http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2012-06-06/news/ct-met-police-officer-prison-20120606_1_sergeants-dues-john-pallohusky
1/12/2016 05:18:00 PM
Well, at least it looks like he's had a really rough time of it in there. Wow. Looks like before and after pics of crack heads.
Hope he ends up living in a shelter.
I get a warm, fuzzy feeling, too. As a retired female po, I know that the LAST thing anyone will expect inside one of these locations is me, meeting their attack with my firearm.
1/12/2016 12:29:00 PM
Totally with you. Retired female PO as well.
You guys are so insensitive. ..those first class citizens were about to turn their lives around. Where is the picture of them in graduation uniform? ..oh wait they didn't even graduate from high school yet.. I'm sure baby mama is calling every attorney in Chicago. If you dig deep mama,there is a way you can blame the police. Those kids are worth about 5 million a piece. That seems to be going rate now days.
Who gives a fuck about a decal on the window. Store owners cant make thier own laws . Ignore them.
Anonymous Anonymous said...
"how does a 15 and 17 year old cps student buy a gun in Chicago , Illinois
toughest gun laws in the USA?"
1/12/2016 07:48:00 AM
Please-please set everyone straight...including THE RANT ......Chicago no longer has "the toughest gun laws in the USA".
Chicago gun laws were thrown out by the federal courts in 2010 and 2013 and all Illinois municipalities came under the state concealed carry statute. A deadline date was set by the state for munis to pass their own laws and only a handful did.
Chicago opted to ban "assault rifles". After the deadline the munis could not enact new gun laws....only the atate.
Now, it seems New York City has the toughest gun laws.
The Store owner under the CC Law has NO choice but to post the No Gun Sign. The law mandates certain places be posted. Bars/Liquor stores the make 50% of their money off liquor sales are mandated to post. So the store isn't hypocritical.
The store owners are hypocrites. Nobody who supports CCW should patronize that store, or any other that has anti-gun stickers on the door.
With a no guns sign, your choices are, affirmatively break an administrative law, or potentially leave yourself defenseless against a cold-blooded murderer. God help me for making the moral decision, and damn those who hate Liberty and force me to choose.
The store owners are hypocrites. Nobody who supports CCW should patronize that store, or any other that has anti-gun stickers on the door.
1/13/2016 08:06:00 AM
As if those who do patronize this vender have ccl's.
Seriously, Shirley?
The Store owner under the CC Law has NO choice but to post the No Gun Sign. The law mandates certain places be posted. Bars/Liquor stores the make 50% of their money off liquor sales are mandated to post. So the store isn't hypocritical.
The store owners are hypocrites. Nobody who supports CCW should patronize that store, or any other that has anti-gun stickers on the door.
1/13/2016 08:06:00 AM
Are you fucking retarded?
"The Store owner under the CC Law has NO choice but to post the No Gun Sign. The law mandates certain places be posted. Bars/Liquor stores the make 50% of their money off liquor sales are mandated to post. So the store isn't hypocritical."
Fail. The law applies to places that serve liquor on the premises, not to places that sell package goods.
Anonymous Anonymous said...
Good question, Under (430 ILCS 66/65) which is the concealed carry act regulating the signs etc. It states in Section 65:
Sec. 65. Prohibited areas.
(a) A licensee under this Act shall not knowingly carry a firearm on or into:...so on so on
What this says is that the holder of a CCL under 430 ILCS 66/65 and ONLY those holders are subject to the GFZ prohibition brought on by the posting of the sign.
It does not have any control over active peace officers or retired officers under HR-218/LEOSA, OR unlicensed holders aka Bad guys and I am sure the deceased were not licensed.......
1/12/2016 02:23:00 AM
=========================
You need to look at HR 218 legislation and review States rights and what the exceptions are with regards to posted properties.
Yes that's what I'm talking about CCL T-mobile employee shoots 2 armed robbers who brandished guns and announced a robbery!!!!!! 🇺🇸
"Bars/Liquor stores the make 50% of their money off liquor sales are mandated to post."
Liquor stores are not required to post, only establishments that serve alcohol for consumption on the premises and such liquor accounts for 51% of sales are required to post.
They were too busy turning their lives around to notice the sign.
Seriously, Shirley?
1/13/2016 12:04:00 PM
Oh, I am serious. And don't call me Shirley.
Read my comment again, more carefully this time, geniuses.
Oh, I am serious. And don't call me Shirley.
Read my comment again, more carefully this time, geniuses.
1/14/2016 03:29:00 AM
per your request:
"The store owners are hypocrites. Nobody who supports CCW should patronize that store, or any other that has anti-gun stickers on the door.
1/13/2016 08:06:00 AM"
So, the store owners are hypocrites for wanting the only persons within their store, enjoying their right to be armed, to be themselves and their employees, correct?
And the presence of a 'no guns allowed' sticker, informing potential customers of the intent of the business establishment to refuse to do business with anyone bearing arms, including those properly licensed to carry concealed, is a reason you recommend to not patronize said business, correct?
As well as any business, of any nature, located anywhere, whether offering goods or services, to any potential customer(s), correct?
So, may it be presumed that you, in your wisdom, have, or have had, or are now currently, the proud owner/ operator of a business, offering goods and/or services to the general public?
And that your business has not a posted 'no guns allowed' sticker, properly displayed?
And that you, as the wise and seasoned owner/operator of a business open to the general public, happily welcome all potential customers into your business, with you having no concern, whatsoever, as to whether or not they are armed?
Post a Comment
<< Home