Did J-Fled Violate Own Policy?
Did Brust just "trick-bag" J-Fled?
The pertinent sections:
The pertinent sections:- Relieving Department members of police powers is an incredibly serious matter which has a profound impact on the member and the Department. The authority to relieve a member of police powers should reside with one member of the senior Command Staff, who will be held accountable for their decision and who understands the significance of this action.
Therefore, from this point forward and in order to ensure consistency and fairness, the Deputy Superintendent of the Bureau of Professional Standards (BPS) will be solely responsible for approving a relief of powers status.
That would be Brust, wouldn't it? And is certainly seems that in light of people being stripped with no evidence (actually in direct conflict with the existing evidence), J-Fled is in direct violation of his own directives. The buck, as they say, stops at the top level of supervision.
Except when the top level of supervision is a known coward and liar we guess.
Except when the top level of supervision is a known coward and liar we guess.
Labels: info for the police
posted by SCC at 12:05 AM
34 Comments:
General Orders for some, guidelines for others.
But don't understand, it was unforgivable. Dopey weis strikes again.
How fast do you think that will be postdated and rescinded?
Just like when he got in a car chase in his suv in 010 a few years ago. New fax message comes out saying the new Tahoe's are capable of chases. It's not bad being the king.
there's a signature machine in his office that signs things like this.Look how crappy the "p" comes out. looks like he had too much red bull.
The stripping in the 6th Dist. was just the latest. Let's pray the 2 officers leave J-Fled, Brust and IPRA without a cent.
Remember when J-Fled publicly endorsed Obama in his capacity as Supt.? Nothing happened. What if one of us had gone on TV and publicly endorsed McCain?
Then Sgt. Northern filed the cowardice complaint when J-Fled "gotta run" the other way as officers were going into harm's way on an murder in 007. I heard Inspector General Ferguson swept it all under the rug. It should have been handled by IAD with 30 days suspension pending separation. That's what happens to cowards. They are the biggest disgrace to the CPD.
I don't know of one officer, bosses included, that respects J-Fled. He is hated. He has no leadership qualities, integrity or shame.
"Relieving Department members of police powers is an incredibly serious matter which has a profound impact on the member and the Department."
Wait... Didnt j-fraud say on a Ch9 news confrence that "Stripping wasnt that serious of a diciplinary action"???
He wouldent lie to us? He said so...
I recommend 30-Pending for J-Fled.
By the time his case gets before the Board, he should be well into his 3rd year as a professional "Cat Whisperer".
The fickle nature of the feline beast will perfectly augment the coward's symbolic de-clawing of the CPD.
He doesn't say a thing about evidence. Apparently, evidence doesn't matter.
He did, however, state that the person in such power will be accountable for his decision to strip officers.
Let's see what he means by accountable.
Two words: Sergeant's class?
worse is the length of time someone is stripped--- didn't possum head state that he wanted to put a six month limit on the amount of time someone is stripped because he understands that it has a debilitating effect on the officer in question---- another brain fart from our dumber than dumb leader...
Shall we have a great big directives bonfire in the lot of 35th street on his last day? Like a tail gate party. Aunt Bea and Tony Abottle as bartenders. Mud wrestling with the little polish bartender. Brust on the pole showing us how to strip. Keating in charge of the segway races. oooohhh...this is gonna be great!
What happened was J-Fled and Burst got together to concoct a BULLSHIT scenario on who was responsible for stripping the officers from the 006th District incident.
This was concocted after sometime after the lawsuit against J-Fed.
Brust is just another sick demented feeb who never was the Police but loves wearing Our Uniform. F'Ng nutbags the lot of them.
Sometimes you wonder if J-Fled even knows how to read but than again he is FBI and we all know how FBI takes credit for the other guys work.
From someone who has been stripped more than 2 years :
IAD/IPRA put the cheese popcorn down and stop mind-screwing people and finish these cases that should have been completed a long long time ago and get these coppers back on the street!
Maybe someone should review the files of the folks who are stripped and see that a large percentage of folks should have never been stripped in the 1st place! Dep Brust-you are being deceived by some of the Iad investigators in that they were instructed to screw some of the hard working guys/gals and you should look into those stripped and ask some hard questions of those reccommending stripping etc... Dont get named as an additional defendant in a federal lawsuit ....
From someone who has been stripped more than 2 years :
IAD/IPRA put the cheese popcorn down and stop mind-screwing people and finish these cases that should have been completed a long long time ago and get these coppers back on the street!
Maybe someone should review the files of the folks who are stripped and see that a large percentage of folks should have never been stripped in the 1st place! Dep Brust-you are being deceived by some of the Iad investigators in that they were instructed to screw some of the hard working guys/gals and you should look into those stripped and ask some hard questions of those reccommending stripping etc... Dont get named as an additional defendant in a federal lawsuit ....
From someone who has been stripped more than 2 years :
IAD/IPRA put the cheese popcorn down and stop mind-screwing people and finish these cases that should have been completed a long long time ago and get these coppers back on the street!
Maybe someone should review the files of the folks who are stripped and see that a large percentage of folks should have never been stripped in the 1st place! Dep Brust-you are being deceived by some of the Iad investigators in that they were instructed to screw some of the hard working guys/gals and you should look into those stripped and ask some hard questions of those reccommending stripping etc... Dont get named as an additional defendant in a federal lawsuit ....
So is this an admission of harm to ones career? Quick ask for more money while it's on black and white
O.K. Just out of interest… I keep reading all these, "Remember this and remember that…" screw ups that J-Fled has accomplished. I would love a running up to date total, because every once in awhile I hear a new one I never knew about, like the Tahoe chase in 010. SCC, is there a possibility of one list? Say starting with Cozzi and going down? Or would it crash the blog?
Whatever happened to j-fuckup's CR number?
And unfortunately nothing will happen nobody will call him on it the media are all to chicken to report it and the public will continue eating the bullshit there being fed about this city so it comes to pass this. Job has Me fed up I want to leave but can't cause not many opportunities out there and I love being the police just not here so fuck it I've decided today I become the one thing I can't stand a big fukin dog
These x-Feds had better get their shit together unless they prefer lawsuits form our WORKING police. The exempts under the x-Feds btter start sticking up for the troops instead of bowing to the top dog. Dugan was stand up with the Capt's and he was demoted. You exempts at the Ivory Tower turned you'r backs on him and other exempts who stood for the WORKING police. Wonder way you are not respected.
I was investigating a CR number on one of my guys ( a few years ago before I retired). The accusation against the officer were false and I so stated. The deputy chief sent back my report with a note attached ( not a report, but a note) to " find something and sustain the allegation. I did a cover sheet quoting the general order which calls for a report from the chain of command with reasons for changing my findings. I got a direct, and very nasty telephone call the next day asking me who in the hell do I think I am quoting orders to her?? I was told the orders are orders for me, guidelines for her. I refused to do so and put that in writing. Never heard about it again.
Anonymous Anonymous said...
Two words: Sergeant's class?
11/01/2010 02:02:00 AM
Two more words: Who Cares?
is a corrupt and crazy city its all about who has the power to fk with the little people in blue these mf dont gve a sht about any officers in this department unless you have juice and only then will they jump sad when the king shines his throne by using his power to mess with hard working humans.
"J-Fled is in direct violation of his own directives..."
"'Do as thou wilt' shall be the whole of the Law."
--Aleister Crowley
...He wouldent lie to us? He said so...
11/01/2010 12:42:00 AM
What would Mr. Bowman say?
brust also hates IAD
Two words: Sergeant's class?
11/01/2010 02:02:00 AM
Sounds like: Cow PooPoo
Didn't you know that there was always 2 sets of G.O.'s
I was investigating a CR number on one of my guys ( a few years ago before I retired). The accusation against the officer were false and I so stated. The deputy chief sent back my report with a note attached ( not a report, but a note) to " find something and sustain the allegation. I did a cover sheet quoting the general order which calls for a report from the chain of command with reasons for changing my findings. I got a direct, and very nasty telephone call the next day asking me who in the hell do I think I am quoting orders to her?? I was told the orders are orders for me, guidelines for her. I refused to do so and put that in writing. Never heard about it again.
11/01/2010 02:40:00 PM
So you had physical proof that an Exempt was trying to unfairly jackpot your guy, and violating General Orders to boot. You had the note, and you did nothing with it. You are a handjob sir. Please, by all means, enjoy your retirement.
So you had physical proof that an Exempt was trying to unfairly jackpot your guy, and violating General Orders to boot. You had the note, and you did nothing with it. You are a handjob sir. Please, by all means, enjoy your retirement.
11/02/2010 07:57:00 AM
--
I agree. The original poster could have CALLED THE UNION and shared this with them! THAT is what we pay dues for! Protection from Management!
scc THAT WOULD BE A GREAT POST LIST ALL J-FLEDS SCREW UP AND THE POST SHOULD BE
STOLE 1 MILLION IN 3 YEARS
WOULD YOU RE-NEW HIS CONTRACT?
GREAT JOB ENJOY RETIREMENT.
WHEN SHOULD THE PAY CUT BEGIN?
THE MEDIA WOULD STEAL THE ARTICLE IN MINUTES.
I was investigating a CR number on one of my guys ( a few years ago before I retired). The accusation against the officer were false and I so stated. The deputy chief sent back my report with a note attached ( not a report, but a note) to " find something and sustain the allegation. I did a cover sheet quoting the general order which calls for a report from the chain of command with reasons for changing my findings. I got a direct, and very nasty telephone call the next day asking me who in the hell do I think I am quoting orders to her?? I was told the orders are orders for me, guidelines for her. I refused to do so and put that in writing. Never heard about it again.
11/01/2010 02:40:00 PM
So you had physical proof that an Exempt was trying to unfairly jackpot your guy, and violating General Orders to boot. You had the note, and you did nothing with it. You are a handjob sir. Please, by all means, enjoy your retirement.
11/02/2010 07:57:00 AM
Hey dipshit- The original post said he did do something. In any event, the idiot was moved over to a lateral position, got to keep her rank and now is the boss over non-existing people. All because her boyfriend sleeps at the top. The point is the same, different rules for the gold star from the silver stars. Thanks Jody for finally giving us transparency. lol
I agree. The original poster could have CALLED THE UNION and shared this with them! THAT is what we pay dues for! Protection from Management!
11/02/2010 09:10:00 AM
Which collective bargaining unit should have been called: the accused's (FOP) or investigator's (PBPA)?
Post a Comment
<< Home