Wednesday, May 20, 2026

More Money Gone

This wold be the second time the meters have been sold.

  • The owner of Chicago’s parking meters is seeking to sell the asset to a New York investment firm — but the deal requires approval from City Council.

    Mayor Brandon Johnson’s office on Monday confirmed the tentative agreement between Chicago Parking Meters LLC and New York-based Stonepeak Partners.

    The deal, which would change ownership of the meters and who collects their profits, now sits before City Council, which could seek concessions in favor of the city before approving it.

    The tentative sale is the most recent development in the fight for parking assets. 

The first sale was Shortshanks underwhelming sale to the Abu Dhabi people that was found to have been priced $974 MILLION less than what Chicago would have collected in meter fees. For a mere $1.15 billion, the buyers made back their money PLUS $500 million between 2008 and 2023, and there were still 60 YEARS left on the deal.

But these people aren't idiots - they see that Groot and Conehead destroyed downtown and anything within ten miles of downtown. Less people than ever are using the meters, so the rate of return on their investment has fallen off a cliff, which is why they're looking to unload. Conehead made noise about buying it all back, but couldn't scrape together the estimated $3 billion needed (thank god). 

But the fact that this "deal" is being estimated at $3 billion and Chicago won't see much (if any) of it, ought to be remembered every time your property taxes go up or some Machine democrat whines about money needed for some useless social program. You had this money generator and you pissed it away to outsiders.

Labels:

27 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hey, why don't we all chip in and buy this money maker? Since they won't let us do any police work, we can sit at a row of meters and when the red flag pops up, ""bam" slap a ticket on the windshield before any more money can be deposited. Maybe we can also do this enforcement while off duty. The possibilities are endless.

5/20/2026 12:35:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Tons of posts when sleepy joe and his son were doing shady business dealings, but not a mention of how our boy said the IRS could never investigate him, his family, or any of his businesses. Not a peep. He lied and screwed us all over.

5/20/2026 01:04:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Democrat’s waist money and don’t understand finances.

5/20/2026 01:26:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Heaven forbid they sell off the sky way toll

5/20/2026 03:56:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Why doesn't Chicago buy it back? Maybe the pension funds? The return wasn't that much, had the firm bought say Coca Cola stock, it would have been oodles more.

5/20/2026 05:09:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

They are so stupid. Why be smart with funds when you can just make money at whim via taxing people into poverty and selling off real revenue streams? Vote the bums out.

5/20/2026 06:19:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

City & state finances are a mess. Young guns, prepare your exit plan. Retirement day comes fast. Work with a professional financial adviser if you believe you need the help. Create a better future for you and your family. Don't procrastinate. I can't overstate the importance of time as it relates to compounding interest. Best wishes to everyone.

The good life is out there somewhere.

https://www.illinoispolicy.org/illinois-combined-state-local-tax-rate-tops-the-country/

5/20/2026 06:44:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

maybe the parent (momma's) of all those criminals that go downtown to riot can be forced to drive there then park and pay the meters? that would help

5/20/2026 07:06:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Wait a minute - The city guarantees the parking and CUTS CHECKS MONTHLY to the owners, whoever they are or will be... CHECK IT OUT YOURSELVES

5/20/2026 07:16:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

--"Why doesn't Chicago buy it back?"
Most of what Chicago manages, turns to crap.
Just look around.

5/20/2026 07:19:00 AM  
Blogger Old Guy said...

Count me on, here’s a buck and I will pay you the rest when the money rolls in (catch me if you can).

5/20/2026 07:39:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I always wondered, how does a private firm "own" a public right of way. Furthermore, if a private firm owns street parking spaces, how can the city fine you for an expired meter?

5/20/2026 07:48:00 AM  
Anonymous The Keesing Bandit said...

Wait for the back door dealing.
Now, kees me you fool!!!!

5/20/2026 08:31:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Speaking of being gone, what is going on with the dispatchers at the OEMC? Has anyone been fired? Has anyone quit in an effort to minimize the repercussions like jail time? Karma is a b@#ch! Someone asked this question in a previous discussion, “does the discharged loan have to be reported as income?” The answer is yes (for the majority of the dispatchers and everyone else who fraudulently obtained the loan or improperly used the loan proceeds). Mr. Tax Man, please set up shop at the Chicago OEMC to get your numbers, you will earn a promotion, rise through the ranks, and make a name for yourself, become the next Elliot Ness, “She gone! You miss me long time?”

5/20/2026 09:02:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Frenchy Martin Says:
The Chicago Way:
So much cheese, so little time to steal it.

5/20/2026 09:40:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

shanks believed Budget Director Volpe advising him the meter sale was a good deal. Subsequently, shanks had some harsh words for Volpe as Volpe was shown the door. FY Volpe!

5/20/2026 10:47:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

So the alderman have no stake in sale and should reject it. WHATS IN IT FOR US. MAYOR BRANDON is a moron ! WATCH the Bears leave too

5/20/2026 10:47:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I just wonder what kind of leverage the city has in approving the sale of the parking meters? I have a feeling that the contract gives the city almost no meaningful leverage to block the deal. That said, what are the reasons the parking meters are up for sale? Do the investment funds know or suspect something that is not in the public? After all, why sell a productive investment unless you need cash in a hurry.

5/20/2026 11:05:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

They don’t have over a billion dollars to pay for it

5/20/2026 11:23:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...


Thats why when ShortShanks croaks Im going to burn a log right on his headstone

5/20/2026 11:58:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The mayor could afford to buy them out now since the bears arent staying here. That frees up about 2 billion and some change. Conehead is a dimwit when it comes to negotiations however and will likely get hoodwinked again and pay twice as much. What an idiot!

5/20/2026 02:07:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Serving up Chicago values since 1837

5/20/2026 02:08:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

There's over 10 billion in pension funds for city employees. Why wouldn't the city invest city pension funds in the city? Every person with a pension should be excited about it right?

5/20/2026 04:02:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

and all the lawyers the city has, all the financial expert's the city has, and all the political analyst the city has also said it was a good deal? I think not

5/20/2026 06:34:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

A city bankruptcy can void the contract. The bankruptcy will happen, and city workers (police) will then be paid $25.00 an hour.

5/21/2026 06:08:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Look up Avis lavelle and you will see what happened with the meters.

5/21/2026 03:56:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

A city bankruptcy can void the contract. The bankruptcy will happen, and city workers (police) will then be paid $25.00 an hour.


This city would lose probably half, if not more police officers, if they tried to cut our pay. Literally almost every department in this country our hiring.

A big cut would be cut the alderman down to 24 or even lower. No need for 50 alderman.

5/21/2026 07:24:00 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Newer Posts.......................... ..........................Older Posts