The Most Dangerous Cities
Coming in at #3....wait a minute....is this right? Springfield, Illinois? What the hell:
- The capital city of Illinois, Springfield ranks third on our list because it had 855 violent crimes per 100,000 residents in 2010. The city also confounds analysts who try to interpret its relatively high crime rate. The unemployment rate was lower than the national average at 7% as of July, so the economy wouldn’t seem to play a major role in crime. And although meth usage saw a small spike in the mid-2000s, a law passed a few years ago making the necessary pharmaceutical ingredients harder to buy seems to have cut down on abuse. There are also poorer neighborhoods – literally on the other side of the railroad tracks – that tend to have higher rates of poverty and the higher rates of crime that accompany that, which contributes to the city’s overall higher rate of crime. Another factor could be Springfield’s relatively young population – 66% of the city is under the age of 44 – and relatively younger populations are historically correlated with higher rates of crime.
The other cities in the top 5 are:
- #5 - Anchorage, Alaska
- #4 - Flint, Michigan
- #2 - Memphis, Tennessee
- #1 - everyone's favorite - Detroit, Michigan
Rockford came in at #10. And Chicago?
Chicago doesn't appear to be in the FBI's statistical table that Forbes magazine used to determine the "most dangerous" cities. Maybe we're missing it. Or maybe Chicago doesn't keep statistics that the FBI can trust to actually determine crime rates.
Chicago doesn't appear to be in the FBI's statistical table that Forbes magazine used to determine the "most dangerous" cities. Maybe we're missing it. Or maybe Chicago doesn't keep statistics that the FBI can trust to actually determine crime rates.
28 Comments:
You can't be noticed if the blanket is pulled firmly over your head, right?
For most of my career, we've been told the FBI refuses to accept the way Chicago compiles its 'statistics' and we aren't included in any of its tables of reckoning.
Perverse, isn't it?
Springfield? Are they confused with East St. Louis???
6. Lubbock, TX
7. Stockton, CA
8. Tallahassee, FL
9. Las Vegas, NV
10. Rockford, IL
Our Crime data in Chicago is transparent. You can't see it.
Read the comments associated with Memphis. The city instituted a program called " Blue Crush" which closely follows the FBI guidelines for reporting crime. They are saying that Blue Crush resulted in reporting many crimes that other cities are missing, crimes that are ging unreported to the FBI and this resulted in a higher ranking for Memphis. They emphasis that crime actually has not increased in that city. Chicago should follow the same format. These ratings onloy show what is actually being reported by the department, not what is actually occuring.
Too bad those stats don't involve crimes against our crooked politicians!
Flint is #5? It was #1 when I quit dispatching there.
springfield is a rough town. Reyn aldo snipes came from springfield. The first light beer ever made in america was test marketed in springfield, forty years ago. In springfield, even today, if you got a problem with someone, you work it out on the bricks. Why do you think they hold en banc hearings there? The streets of springfield have street cred.
chicago wont be on there simply because of the size of the population, that will water down and crime statistic
It's tough to be in business in Illinois. Due to the lack of concealed carry in Illinois I don't know who I fear more the criminal element or those we elect in Springfield.
Here's a popular explanation as to why Chicago is routinely left out of these types of lists. From Wikipedia (I know, take it or leave it):
"Because the Chicago Police Department tallies data differently than police in other cities, the FBI often does not accept its crime statistics. Chicago police officers record all criminal sexual assaults, as opposed to only rape. They count aggravated battery together with the standard category of aggravated assault. As a result, Chicago is often omitted from studies such as Morgan Quitno's annual 'Safest/Most Dangerous City' survey, which relies on FBI-collected data."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crime_in_Chicago
Figures Lie
Liars Figure
I cant wait to move to waupaca.
We are so high up there that they are afraid to post us
Sounds about right. All those Democrat politicians hang out there. Dangerous place for normal working folk.
Guess those cities havent learned the fine art of downgrading/number crunching/baffle em with bullshit.
No chicago does not participate... go figure. They dont give their stats to the fbi.. just another thing the city of chicago does ass backwards. I cant stand this city...so arrogant and self important.
Forget the crime rates folks. Keep your eyes open and listen up. In your house, going outside to walk the dog...go to the store...go to work...or whatever. Sleeping? Keep that Glock nearby. Look over your shoulder and alwys be aware the bad guys are lurking.
Obvioulsy they took into account the many crimes occuring in the state house and gov's mansion.
The Feebs do not use chicago statistics. At least they did not when I was on the job. They do not trust CPD and anyone with an ounce of brains would not trust the Feebs.
old retired guy
SCC you're right, CPD doesn't submit the REQUIRED Correct crime classifications to the FBI. That will change soon.
john said...
The Feebs do not use chicago statistics. At least they did not when I was on the job. They do not trust CPD and anyone with an ounce of brains would not trust the Feebs.
old retired guy
10/05/2011 03:21:00 PM
yeah, like anyone with a brain would trust the Feds either. Does the name Eric Holder ring a bell?
Anchorage? Seriously? I would think it would be last on the list? What is up in Anchorage?
No wonder Quinn lives in Chicago!!!!! "Like its better"
"Dick Turban" lives in Springfield, This whole state is nothing more than an owerflowing sewer flooded with crooked elected scum and criminals and dickhead Spendocrats in 3 counties that keep voting the scum in office!!!!!
And who would want to go.
US OKs $196.5M for high-speed Chicago-Detroit Rail.
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/breaking/chi-us-oks-1965m-for-highspeed-chicagodetroit-rail-20111005,0,6690857.story
HELLO MEDIA ASS-HAT!
FIND THE PERSON IN CHARGE OF THE STUDY!
THEN POINT BLANK ASK WHY DOESNT CHICAGO HAVE A RATING ?
BUT I GUESS THAT WOULD BE TOOOO HARD BECAUSE THE PEOPLE IN CHARGE OF STUDIES THAT AFFECT R LIVES DONT PUT THEIR NAMES ON THE BOTTOM.
Chicago crime stats are so low, Rahm can count them on just two hands with a half a finger left over!
Fuzzy math FTW!
When the tax man comes to you, there is never any category and area wide omission now is there?
Lol...Springfield Illinois use 2 be nicer n a lot of ppl sleep on Springfield because of the population smh but of course it not worser than a 6million populated city ppl its not a competition it ppls lives were talk in here...blacks 4 u quick 2 compete but run from there city's out of fear 24/7 Ain't never seen a city dat defends so much wat they fear but Chicago ppl ...yea y'all win n loose 2 ;)
Post a Comment
<< Home