Half Story = Half-Assed Protests
- People are outraged over the latest officer-involved shooting where the ACLU and the media are reporting that the officers shot 16-year-old Jayson Negron “who was driving a car.” What the ACLU fails to mention is that Negron was driving a stolen car, and he was driving it over a police officer at the time he was shot.
According to NBC Connecticut, police attempted to stop at stolen vehicle at 5 PM on Tuesday. Jayson Negron sped off, hitting several vehicles and driving in the wrong direction before stopping. The driver then stopped and the officers approached. That’s when Negron accelerated in reverse, hitting an officer, pinning him under the vehicle.
The other officer responded by firing one shot into the car. The bullet fatally struck Jayson Negron, and injured the passenger, Julian Fyffe...
The Chief is standing behind his officers in the face of ACLU lies and planned protests. Rest assured, if this had happened in Chicago though, the Officer would be facing charges as the vehicle was the only force being used against the officer, hence a violation of the General Order 03-02-03 Section III-E:
- Use of firearms in the following ways is prohibited - Firing at or into a moving vehicle when the vehicle is the only force used against the sworn member or another person.
Labels: out-of-state, shooting
posted by SCC at 12:01 AM
28 Comments:
I always wondered about that general order. So basicially they have to be shooting at you AND trying to run you over with the car so you can shoot at them? Talk about using hands free devices while driving.
It is interesting that as a civilian with a concealed deal, to an extent which is becoming clearer every day--- has more privilege to light up asshole light a Christmas tree; than a poleeeec office does. No mo lightin us up office. May ass well put a rubber gun in my holster
"You mean and racist Warrior Cops just want to
be free to kill members of the community for
no good reason. You need to be trained not
to be so quick to resort to your fists
and guns while interacting with the community
and you need to be held accountable for your actions!"
I repeat------ Slow Down.
Yep SCC every one knows a car can't be used as a weapon........ um wait.. see above story.
This would be the perfect opportunity for the department to revert back to logic and common sense and change that order.
Don't hold your breath. Rahm and the department never will admit to being wrong.
Hows the copper
Anonymous said...
It is interesting that as a civilian with a concealed deal, to an extent which is becoming clearer every day--- has more privilege to light up asshole light a Christmas tree; than a poleeeec office does. No mo lightin us up office. May as well put a rubber gun in my holster
5/14/2017 12:22:00 AM
This is true, SAD but true.
A couple of thousand pounds of stolen metal and plastic, being recklessly projected at a high rate of speed, is a Very Real threat to the general public. Yet, we have reached a point where a police officer using deadly force to stop said threat, is him/herself considered the threat! So we have reached a point, where it is probably better for police officers to Let the Stolen Auto Go! Just like we have virtually legalized Weed in Illinois, we are rapidly approaching the legalization of Property Crimes! Baby "G"
A Chief standing behind his cops? Here, they would rather stand behind Rahm.
Police are expected to observe the following rules:
No firing at or into a moving vehicle
No high speed chases
No offensive comments or discriminatory language toward moving vehicles
No direct eye contact
Absolutely no search and seizure of any vehicle without the expressed written consent of Major League Baseball
I don't understand this from what I'm reading is it true a person cannot be charged with murder if you use your car to commit murder if this is true I want to know more about it.any info would be appreciated.
Great shooting skills displayed! That officer would be a big asset to his Dept. Range trading.
Can't that commie-pinko aclu be charged with obstruction of justice, or something?
Who the FUCK came up with this Gen. Order????...
Special ED is called "Special" for a reason, and in this case special is not a good thing. Kinda like you don't want to attend a school for "exceptional children". Ps.
Oh cmon guys, lets have some sympathy..you know well mom is so deeply tramatized and shes trying to hold back the FAKE crocodile tears knowing well she just LOST another state check for her kid since daddy is locked up and she needs her daily dose of potato chips, pepsi and Jerry Springer !!
So, I am interested, IF a civilian with a CCW volunteers to go on a ride-a-long with officers, and a vehicle is used as a weapon against others in the manner described in the article, then would it the civilian CCW holder be able to engage to save self or others from death or harm?
OR
Would it be an idea that CCW holders traveling the city, when they see Officers working a situation as described, stand "over watch" in case of danger?
I figure that not only would the officers have another witness to the justification of their actions but a back up that can help save their lives.
This General Order is just meant to hang you with. You know the minds that thought up this General Order will never have to face what the Officer on the street may face. This is leadership from behind. Do as I say, not as I do. No, the Officer on the street can't stay holed up inside a brick building all day long.
That General Order is just wrong!
J.J.
I wish Trump would speak up about this incident regarding fake news media reporting their lies at usual!!! ACLU =TRASH
Use of firearms in the following ways is prohibited - Firing at or into a moving vehicle when the vehicle is the only force used against the sworn member or another person.
--
is this the only wording? There's no "when you can safely retreat without getting hit by the car" wording?
So what if.... You inserted your patrol car in through the drivers door of the shitbag Vehicle "not" using deadly force? Sounds like just a traffic accident.
Then obama era crime wave has yet to slowdown.
And with idiots like Rahm, DeBlasio, FoxWinkle and Mooos'by running things, criminals have no intention on letting up.
USAG Sessions needs to draft Federal laws to prosecute every aspect of attacks on police officers by keeping these crimes from the biased and liberal lenient local courts.
Since it wasn't Rahm's Sanctuary, there will be no Entitled Settlement Money doled out either.
If you violate a general order the department can fire you even if your actions are in compliance with state law. Chicago better hope that no ISIS terrorist uses a truck to run down citizens, something that has happened in many parts of the civilized world.
To the unpublished:
The phrase "Sworn members will not unreasonably endanger themselves or another person to conform" merely means you will not step into or remain in the path of a moving vehicle in order to justify shooting at the vehicle.
This was explained by a Department lawyer when the order came out - you still cannot fire at a moving vehicle if the vehicle is the only force being used against you or another. Period.
It's a poorly written order, written to justify hanging a copper out to dry for a politically unpalatable shooting. Or haven't you been paying attention to the cases That Foxxx and IPRA have been re-opening?
5/14 @8:30am - Some interesting reading in the latest American Police Beat runs similar to your question. They list 5 recent incidents where good citizens saw a peace officer attempting to arrest/fighting with/struggling for their life, etc. The good citizen either pulled their CCW and shot the offender or in one case a 56 yoa woman jumped in and got physical. The officers credited the citizens with either aiding their arrest or actually saving their life (as in a Michigan incident where the offender was dispatched to hell.) They weren't on a ride along, just in the right place at the right time. APB has a digital version if you want to read the whole story.
OT: exhibiting biased reporting this past Friday was Ch. 5 Ash-hur Quereshi who while covering the Garfield Park OIS stated that CPD "emptied their clip" while engaging the female offender. Hey Ash-hur, did the Kimesha Foxx shooting team allow you to examine the officer's weapon? Did a video tape show the slide lock in place indicating that the last round was fired? Are you trying to follow Carol Marin's lead with award winning false news? NBC5 = Nothing But Crap!
Retired .38 spl +P
Why do we carry any weapons at all?
With stupid department guidelines that are only written to hamstring police.
We should turn our weapons in and ask for new ipad so we can. Write or video tape
the incidents. Just so we can collect our IOD or death benifits.
Such details do not matter to the media!
I really don't understand why you guys don't just go on walkout. How long could they hold out? I'm guessing 24 hrs max. The icing on the cake is that progressive liberals would have to support you because unions.
Post a Comment
<< Home