Nolle Pros = Lawsuit?
- The war on cops is moving from the streets to the U.S. Supreme Court. Last week, the Justices heard a case that threatens police officers with financial ruin if they make arrests and the charges later get dropped.
It started with a late night bash. District of Columbia police officers were called by neighbors at 1 a.m. to investigate a rowdy party at an unoccupied row house. The police found 21 partygoers, liquor, trash, and used condoms strewn about, the smell of marijuana, and women with cash stuffed in their thongs. The partygoers scattered, hiding in closets.
When questioned, some told police “Peaches had invited them.” Some gave other stories. The police phoned “Peaches,” who admitted not having the owner’s permission to use the house. The police then called the owner, who confirmed no one had permission. Two hours after being summoned, the police made the decision to arrest the partygoers for trespassing — the judgment call at issue in this case.
The charges were later dropped, because it wasn’t clear beyond a reasonable doubt the partygoers knew they were trespassing. But sixteen turned around and sued the police for false arrest and violating their constitutional rights.
Luckily, President Trump nominated Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court and this suit should die an ignominious death:
- The justices should put a stop to it. Fortunately, the Court has a long record of protecting the police from legal liability, provided there’s no evidence of malice or a deliberate violation of the Constitution.
If merely making an arrest puts cops at risk of getting sued and clobbered with legal fees and damage awards, what police officer will ever make an arrest? One mistake could mean losing their home and everything else. Faced with that risk, who would ever want to be a cop?
But in case you were wondering what the end-game is of the ACLU and Rahm's "consent decree:"
- Twenty-six states and the federal Justice Department are weighing in with a strong warning that allowing the lower court ruling to stand would have “vast consequences” for law enforcement everywhere. On the other side, the American Civil Liberties Union is pushing to shrink or even eliminate the police’s legal immunity. The ACLU wants police to have no room for error.
All sorts of interesting and informative links at the original article. It wouldn't hurt anyone to read a few.
Labels: info for the police
posted by SCC at 12:05 AM
88 Comments:
19p
Lemme guess. These coppers saw all these arrests and were foaming at the mouth cuz their “numbers” would impress their bosses. See what the “numbers” game can get you in. That’s why I laugh at the constant we need this we need that from bosses that never worked the streets. Numbers games get coppers jammed up. If it ain’t there don’t create. Not worth the headache
Don't do jack shit!
If this gets struck down--- don't clap--- eventually it will get through. All of a matter of time. I told people, the democrats have been pissed off since 1968. When another democrat is made president-- all this bullshit will flood the Supreme Court given a justice is tagged like a WWF match
Police work is no longer fetal.
Police work is DEAD.
Why ANYONE does anything is beyond me. Keep up the ISRs boys
This one's easy, SCC...
The Police simply must stay out
of "The Community's" business.
No matter how mayors, media outlets,
city councils, community groups,
white-guilt liberals self-inflated with
over weening privilege, smug, nasty-assed
entitlement and feel-goodery howl for
"somebody to do something."
Protect yourselves from THEM
and their enablers.
Always...
Police Like You Have No Friends.
No nolle pros if no arrest, end of story. Get the winter blankets out and renew the netflix account.
Nothing to fear here. Our union will be on top of this like always.
Forcing a pinch = lawsuit, if it isn't there it isn't there boys and girls. Trespass is pretty clear in Illinois, were they on notice not to be there?, no?, ISRs, case report, secure property for owner then a peaceful nights sleep in your own house that you will continue to own.
Please read the link.
Three of the Supreme's are totally batshit crazy.
They hate the police,
They want to destroy the police.
God bless Trump.
Long live Trump, so he can appoint RIght judges.
My money is on Park No. 574 having the 574th homicide for the year
OT On Wednesday night on FOX News, Tucker Carlson interviewed Alderman Cardenas who thinks Chicago needs more gun control to stop the carnage. And on Hannity, Sean Hannity interviewed President Trump who had some comments regarding the carnage one of which was poor management! Whom could he be refering to? You can probably pick these interviews up on youtube, or the Fox network.
Since when does Nolle pros= error? A lack of desire to pursue certain charges can get tossed for whatever reason they feel like using. I know I am preaching to the choir, but for those not familiar with the court systems they toss winnable cases all the time. Do you think anyone is going to do a damn thing if they can be sued because one lawyer or crotchity old judge just doesn't feel like moving forward on your case?
Welcome to thunder dome.
My first lawsuit was for false arrest on criminal trespass, with signed complaints. I'm now facing another for the same charge on a different arrests with sign complaints again. With everything going on I'm thinking it's time to jump ship to a new career.
why the supremes would even hear this asinine case defies logic. with a 5-4 majority I fail to understand the reasons.
finally why weren't these yutes in bed for school the next day? Or getting ready to go to work the next morning... wait... nevermind
So now we don't have "good faith" decisions anymore. One small honest mistake and we are wiped the fuck out. Whereas I can see a citizen saying "So what." They really need to pay attention to this one.
I love liberals. Cry Police brutality but when they get their IPhone stolen they scream at the top of their lungs to shoot the mother fucker!!!
Bwahahaha! Policing has gotten soooo bad that the "dogs" in this department might actually have a Supreme Court decision to legally support their laziness. Will "stay fetal" become a nationally recognized ad hoc legal term like "Mirandized" or "furtive movement"?! No matter the decision SCC...the verdict is in. Policing is dead. This department is a failure factory. Survival is the only rational option.
to you younger guys... Max out deffered today.
OT-Could the Chicago motorcycle cop that told Trump that he knew how to stop the violence in Chicago immediately please reveal himself. Come forward and prove that Trump is telling the truth.
Say what you will about President Trump (and heaven knows he gives a lot to be said about), but his appointment of Gorsuch, and hopefully 2 more in his term(s) make his election worth putting up with all the noise and nonsense of the left. Personally, the Supreme Court was the biggest reason I voted for him and thankfully it has been validated. God bless the police and the USA.
Luckily, President Trump nominated Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court and this suit should die an ignominious death....................................
Don't bet on it. The suit should die and probably will. But, you never know these days, especially with so called Republicans and Conservatives who seem to be made of jello.
The Soda Tax is dead?
Well, eventually. December 1st?
https://legalinsurrection.com/2017/10/bloombergs-cook-county-soda-tax-repealed-months-after-its-implementation/
Charges dropped because partygoers didn't know they were trespassing????? Day one of law class in the academy we were taught that ignorance is not an alibi. Shouldn't a judge know this?
Beware these holier than thou Sergeants! They will push you and push you then run away when crap goes bad. Think for yourselves. Just because they cheat on a test doesn't make them smart.
This kinda shuts down the new generation tact team doesn’t it. So much for the last way to get an easy head!
Stay fetal fool!
No signed complaint NO ARREST!
even domestics.
The thought of all those icky girls with cash in their thongs sickens me.
Now, kees me you fool!!!!
Why would you arrest the mopes if you weren't sure that the party goers knew they were not allowed to be there. If you go to a big party at someone's house do you really know if the owner has given permission to the party? Unless you are absolutely sure don't arrest. Time to change the thinking.
I think any make up of court would rule in the officers favor. Grouch actually scares me, he is so conservative he might interpret it that if the party goers did not receive a warning and given the opportunity to he might say their fourth amendment rights were violated. Don't equate conservative with backing the police, there is long history of conservative judges interpreting cases against the police in favor of a stricter interpretation of constitutional matters.
In reading the article and links, I immediately saw the problem as to how police were held liable for damages. The original Court Case was heard by a D.C. JURY.
With that jury pool there was no way the cops were not going to be held liable. The trial might as well have been held in a Black Lives Matter 'clubhouse', or at the local Black Panther HQ.
an aside: That same D.C. jury pool is why that special council asshole Bob Mueller has a Grand Jury in D.C. going after Paul Manafort in addition to an original one in NY. Anyone not a flaming leftist democrat is automatically 'guilty'.
St. Louis police would face limits on using pepper spray, tear gas under proposal
ST. LOUIS • Putting limits on when police officers can use chemical agents or order crowds to disperse would help protect demonstrators’ First Amendment rights, supporters of a bill filed this week argue.
Under the measure, the St. Louis Police Department can issue orders to disperse only if “a significant number or percentage of the assembly participants” fail to adhere to certain restrictions, engage in violence or destroy property, or if the mayor declares a public safety emergency.
Pause
Current Time 0:00
/
Duration Time 0:00
Stream TypeLIVE
Loaded: 0%Progress: 0%0:00
Fullscreen
00:00
Mute
It also requires police to issue at least one order to disperse — and multiple orders if possible — using an amplification system reaching 40 feet away, giving participants “reasonable and adequate” time to disperse and a safe and clear route for dispersal. At least one order would also be required before deploying chemical agents.
Officers would not be able to use chemical agents on protesters or groups who fail to disperse, only on individuals who have “caused or attempted to cause serious physical injury to another person.” Pepper spray and other agents could not be used on individuals who are already restrained.
Additionally, the bill would require all officers to have their name tags visible at all times and mandate that the department promptly process and release anyone who was arrested during an event.
http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/crime-and-courts/st-louis-police-would-face-limits-on-using-pepper-spray/article_17c2c08d-69fa-5bc1-b8d5-6d566f9445fd.html
Anonymous said:
"Sean Hannity interviewed President Trump who had some comments regarding the carnage one of which was poor management! Whom could he be refering to? You can probably pick these interviews up on youtube, or the Fox network."
video here:
Sean Hannity 10/11/17 | One-On-One With President Trump | Fox News Today October 11, 2017
Move slider to the 20 minute mark.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VUlpsMitStw
I believe a gang sgt in 024 locked up 50-60 people under the same circumstances. She later was made merit Lt. by Boggs, though that was probably because her husband was tight with and later worked for Devine when he retired from this job. Right KS? Watch out she has kids on the job now.
Sotomayor is obsessed with race ... typical liberal
I would love to read the appellate court ruling but no link
This court will grant even more immunity. The sky is not falling......yet.
Even with the solid legal footing of
a victim signing complaints against
the offender, the progressives want
to be able to "Punish" Policemen for
making a lawful arrest after a lazy-assed
democratic judge or prosecutor/state's
attorney deliberately fails to do their job?
If this is to be the newest and best anti-Police
gambit by the left, then there is no reason for
judges and prosecutors/state's attorney's to
retain the privilege of immunity.
Let EVERY living ass in the judicial system now
be equally imperiled.
If judges and prosecutors/state's attorneys have it
in their minds that it's perfectly fine and morally
acceptable to maroon The Police in this fashion,
then they too should be left naked and in the cold.
That way, EVERYBODY can gather around to point
and laugh not just at the poor slob Policemen caught
up in this horrible shit, but also at the judges, prosecutors
and state's attorneys who facilitated the deliberate trick
bagging of Policemen on orders of their liberal progressive
masters and bed mates.
Protect Yourselves From THEM.
Police Like You Have No Friends.
Something VERY wrong in Chicago when they put
Preckwinkle audio on radio news stating all hell will
break loose once the tax goes away.
Don't count on local merchants to stock up for a big
run on product after Dec. 1st.
Just had a late breaking thought...
So if the ACLU and liberal progressive judges
and prosecutors/state's attorneys are so hell
bent on using the Nolle Pros to deliberately
set up Policemen for retributive legal action
on the back end of legal and justifiable arrests
on a complaint signed by a victim/complainant,
then let's have fun with the current state of affairs,
shall we?
Go through all the steps as just as if you were
actually going to make the arrest...
Commit names and/or physical identifiers of the
miscreants to the report.
Advise the complainant to go to their local
branch court to obtain warrants/summonses
on the miscreants involved...
Voila'...
No punitive legal actions against Policemen
for making an arrest.
Watch the lefty progressive judges, prosecutors/
state's attorneys squirm when this tactic becomes
S.O.P.
Oh yeah...
They'll gin up all kinds of nasty-grams
to mayors and superintendents demanding
that they order The Police to "knock it off."
No more being back-doored with a bullshit
Nolle Pros by lazy-assed democrat affiliated
judges, prosecutors/state's attorneys.
Ignorant and deliberately tone-deaf supervisors
will shit-talk, brow-beat, bully and threaten you
because they won't be able to wrap their pointy,
meritcloutoriously promoted heads around what
you're doing...
The hard chargers will have a hard time too.
You see, real, actual "Patrolmen" have "adapt
and overcome" deeply ingrained if not hard wired.
Adapting and overcoming sometimes takes a little
extra time.
It takes a few years to acquire the deft touch,
the mental acuity and situational awareness
to facilitate being able to adapt and overcome
as a Policeman with a large, democrat-controlled
urban center Police Department and the unholy,
treacherous, potentially life-altering mess that it is.
...And you'll be resoundingly condemned and found
at fault for having the utter audacity for attempting
to mitigate or at least somehow manage the shit
that impacts you with at least a controlled collision.
Ignorant m/fers get all up in their own asses
with manufactured angst/ire about why you keep
trying to pump the brakes to protect yourself as
best you can.
Protect Yourselves From THEM.
ALWAYS.
Police Like You Have No Friends.
The rough cookie is not a motocycle cop, but a cop that rides a motorcycle. I know this because I ride a scooter and in our MC club I go by tough cookie. Me and rough cookie are bad dudes
President Trump is without a doubt pro-policing and is fighting an uphill battle for "law and order!" When this happens here that Sessions gets here with his team of "real American investigators" and places the rahm crew,the toni crew,the luis crew,the bruce crew "in custody then we can finally resolve many issues and protect the citizens here!
DOJ issues 'last chance' warning to sanctuary cities
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/10/12/doj-issues-last-chance-warning-to-sanctuary-cities.html
Excerpt:
n a notice reviewed by Fox News, the DOJ announced that five jurisdictions “have preliminarily been found to have laws, policies, or practices that may violate” a key federal statute concerning cooperation with federal immigration officials.
They are: Chicago, New Orleans, New York City, Philadelphia and Cook County, Ill.
Attorney General Jeff Sessions said in a written statement that sanctuary cities “adopt the view that the protection of criminal aliens is more important than the protection of law-abiding citizens and of the rule of law.”
The Justice Department said the five cities and counties in question will have until Oct. 27 to “provide additional evidence that the interpretation and application of their laws, policies, or practices comply with the statute.”
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
As rahm talks about his "chicago values" which are criminal in nature,while violating federal immigration laws, finally looks like our prayers ,letters,emails,phone calls will be answered soon! The "forgotten men and women of chicago,crook county,state of corruption illinois" will God willing see some justice served!
So will Oct 27th, be the final date then after the feds come in and take the elected who aid and abet into federal custody? Will we be able to help them load up the busses full of criminals from the county building and city hall? Will the state police begin arresting the state elected violators?
fake dishonest media here will destroy you along with little tommy "im a pizza man" dart."Until this happens stay fetal, don't be that fish caught on a thin string and the 24/
Anonymous The Box Chevy Phantom said...
This one's easy, SCC...
The Police simply must stay out
of "The Community's" business.
No matter how mayors, media outlets,
city councils, community groups,
white-guilt liberals self-inflated with
over weening privilege, smug, nasty-assed
entitlement and feel-goodery howl for
"somebody to do something."
Protect yourselves from THEM
and their enablers.
Always...
Police Like You Have No Friends.
10/12/2017 12:30:00 AM
------------
Remember Freddie Gray?
Baltimore DA Marylin Mosby requested the Baltimore Police do a drug sweep in a known drug spot in her City Council Husband's ward. The drug activity was pissing off her husband and his constituents. The Police complied with her request, and that was when they interacted with Freddie Gray.
Six Bogus manslaughter indictments. That was the thanks they got from Ms. Mosby for trying to clean up her hubby's ward.
Anonymous Anonymous said...
I love liberals. Cry Police brutality but when they get their IPhone stolen they scream at the top of their lungs to shoot the mother fucker!!!
10/12/2017 03:19:00 AM
Tell them to get a FOID, Permit, and do it themselves!!!
Anonymous Anonymous said...
Say what you will about President Trump (and heaven knows he gives a lot to be said about), but his appointment of Gorsuch, and hopefully 2 more in his term(s) make his election worth putting up with all the noise and nonsense of the left. Personally, the Supreme Court was the biggest reason I voted for him and thankfully it has been validated. God bless the police and the USA.
10/12/2017 06:18:00 AM
I couldn't agree more, but lets look at what drives the lefties crazy, the NRA. Right after the shooting the whore Hilary is saying we have to fight the NRA about suppressors and other nonsense. That night when this bitch attacked the NRA, like their to blame for the terrible act of this madman, I joined the NRA. Not because I'm for guns or against, but because it's driving the left nuts.
I got a kick outta this previous post!
****
"I love liberals. Cry Police brutality but when they get their IPhone stolen they scream at the top of their lungs to shoot the mother fucker!!!"
Retired, 30+
Keep this in mind Officers, MERE OCCUPANCY in a vehicle reported stolen does NOT = knowledge, even if the column is peeled
RWOC = automatic log# and CR# i just welded my handcuffs: no more! no mas!
How about we just write the report and tell the victim to go to the SA and let them charge the offender?
Wouldn't a good solution be to make police immune from such suits\ financial judgements and instead require the municipalities to be the defendants in such litigation?
Here is the future of the CPD:
British Transport Police are disadvantaging white, male applicants by excluding them from recruitment workshops.
The force is holding the workshops in London, Manchester, and Birmingham — but one would-be officer was turned away after being told they were for “women and black or ethnic minority” candidates only, reports The Metro.
“I am a white heterosexual male and also a member of the armed forces, how can a public service blatantly support this kind of discrimination and inequality
http://www.breitbart.com/london/2017/10/12/british-police-force-uses-positive-action-ban-white-men-recruitment-workshops/
solution: don't make arrests
Police chief: Support law enforcement, don’t tear it down
Cook County State’s Attorney Kim Foxx may need a reminder that she is a prosecutor and not a defense attorney, according to Riverside’s police chief Tom Weitzel.
“She should be sounding like a prosecutor, not a defense attorney,” Weitzel said. “We should be working together to process cases, but she wants to do separate investigations of cases because of her mistrust of police. Stop painting everything the police do as wrong. We are both supposed to be working for the people.
http://chronicleillinois.com/news/cook-county-news/police-chief-support-law-enforcement-dont-tear/
Let's make CPD great again!
Don’t forget ,Brothers and Sisters in Blue, if the NFL players kneel during to the national Anthem tonight turn off the game and watch something else. I have watched the Bears this year but no other games. Theier kneeling will result in the NFL going out of business after being down 11,% this year. Those unemployed players will never find another job. Thanks for your support.
It won't happen, but not because of the efforts of the two liberals Obama put on the court. Liberals should not have police drivers and bodyguards and should not be allowed to have armed private bodyguards, since they are against the rest of us defending outselves.
how about....doing nothing.......wouldn't that solve everything?
Whatever happened to leftisthebest? Crying because Obama left office?
Proco Joe Moreno is in the news,
http://reason.com/blog/2017/10/12/chicago-alderman-who-told-businessman-to
What it amounts to and where it originated:
The Dindu Nuffin and y'all Acting Stupidly™
The Rule of Law was altered to fit a racist police narrative.
(OT) very scary scenario 90% :
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/congress-warned-north-korean-emp-attack-would-kill-90-of-all-americans/article/2637349
solution: don't make arrests
Yeah I do stay fetal but my two damn suits have come from signed complaints. Your not safe unless your out of this career.
The Soda Tax is dead?
Well, eventually. December 1st?
And you can thank CPS for our additional $200.00 a year additional tax. Have you noticed not one word from any politician.
Me and rough cookie are bad dudes
10/12/2017 10:40:00 AM
Gruff Cookie
Muff Cookie
Buff Cookie
Fluff Cookie
'Nuff Cookie
Puff Cookie
Any more cookies.....?
Anonymous Anonymous said...
My first lawsuit was for false arrest on criminal trespass, with signed complaints. I'm now facing another for the same charge on a different arrests with sign complaints again. With everything going on I'm thinking it's time to jump ship to a new career.
10/12/2017 01:17:00 AM
There is an opening in Hollywood for a producer right now.
02:11:00 PM
Actually, Riverside Police Chief is slightly wrong regarding the role of the police. They are supposed to be non partisans "just the facts, Ma'am." Police are not ENPLOyEES of the prosecution. Neutrality. You are not there to get convictions. Just develop facts.
"RWOC = automatic log# and CR# "
Where did you get that?
This can be addressed if a judge finds probable cause first, and then the ASA nolles.
If that were to pass, cities might as well do away with police departments. There will be no arrests. When a citizen reports a crime online, the States Attorney reviews and if it sees the need, issues a warrant that the sheriff serves. But only on judge approval.
If that were to pass, cities might as well do away with police departments. There will be no arrests. When a citizen reports a crime online, the States Attorney reviews and if it sees the need, issues a warrant that the sheriff serves. But only on judge approval.
And how can one really prove the subject was knowingly and intentionally remaining on the land of the owner/agent?
Do a case report. Advise warrant. Done.
Why doesn’t the aclu just be the police? If they know it all, then they can do it all.
Anonymous Anonymous said...
Anonymous Anonymous said...
I love liberals. Cry Police brutality but when they get their IPhone stolen they scream at the top of their lungs to shoot the mother fucker!!!
Sorry...busy being fetal
10-22/1017 Advise the complainant to go to their local branch court to obtain warrants/summonses on the miscreants involved...
It's called "known offender(s)" that'll usually stop a chase also depending on the crime.
But truthfully, thank you for proactive thinking
The appellate court decision is 41 pages. I skimmed it a bit and one thing I noticed is the court granted the plaintiffs (arrestees) partial summary judgment as to the false arrest.
Summary judgment means there are no facts at issue and the judge can rule as a matter of law, without a trial. It seems a bad move to me anyway. A fact at issue, in this case, is whether it was reasonable for the arresting officer to believe that, in fact, these arrestees did not know who the owner was, knew they were trespassing, despite their statement that they believed they had permission to party at the house. Happens all the time.
And, as a side note, doesn't the CTTV statute omit the knowledge requirement?
The greater issue is the immunity - still have to get to that.
Anonymous said...
10-22/1017 Advise the complainant to go to their local branch court to
obtain warrants/summonses on the miscreants involved...
It's called "known offender(s)" that'll usually stop a chase also depending on the crime.
But truthfully, thank you for proactive thinking
10/13/2017 06:38:00 AM
"Go through all the steps as just as if you were
actually going to make the arrest...
Commit names and/or physical identifiers of the
miscreants to the report."
Heh...
You deliberately left out a couple of key steps
with which the alleged complainant CAN
obtain a warrant/summons.
Fixed it for ya...
If the alleged complainant gets blown-off while
trying to obtain a warrant/summons, failure to
provide service will be the fault of the court
and not The Police.
Don't be one of the "vexed."
Anonymous Anonymous said...
And how can one really prove the subject was knowingly and intentionally remaining on the land of the owner/agent?
Do a case report. Advise warrant. Done.
10/12/2017 11:38:00 PM
Agreed you are correct!!
Anonymous Anonymous said...
"RWOC = automatic log# and CR# "
Where did you get that?
10/12/2017 09:48:00 PM
That's just somebody throwing around terminology they've picked up from here to try to sound like they know what they're talking about. It doesn't even make sense if you really know how things work. Nice try!
Anonymous Anonymous said...
The Soda Tax is dead?
Well, eventually. December 1st?
And you can thank CPS for our additional $200.00 a year additional tax. Have you noticed not one word from any politician.
Don't worry. CPS is not through yet. This was in addition to the new state money they were given. They will be crying and receive more in the next few months.
How can you complain. With the test scores they must be doing a great job and remember "it's for the children"
Not easy producing these results when you have less students, a constantly declining and receive addition funds every year
I'm fetal and don't care.............
Anonymous said...
This can be addressed if a judge finds probable cause first, and then the ASA nolles.
10/12/2017 11:20:00 PM
Are you volunteering to be the guinea pig for that little experiment when the time comes? That’s putting a lot of trust in judges and ASA’s that don’t give a shit about you or your family.
Anonymous said...
Anonymous Anonymous said...
And how can one really prove the subject was knowingly and intentionally remaining on the land of the owner/agent?
Do a case report. Advise warrant. Done.
10/12/2017 11:38:00 PM
Agreed you are correct!!
10/13/2017 11:21:00 AM
And ignore the white shirted gnats buzzing around
your ears about "you shoulda made an arrest."
Or better still, ignore/avoid the ones who threaten to
maroon your report in the queue because you
rightfully exercise the discretion you have
per G.O. and the law...
Shit's gotten really silly over the last
several years over Policemen doing what
needs to be done to protect themselves.
I figured there would be lawsuits filed years ago in BR 48 when the judge would rule " Finding of No Probable Cause " for cases with less than a gram of narcotics. No matter what the circumstances were for arrest and how the recovery of the narcotics occurred, it would always be finding of no probable cause based solely on weight....
Anonymous said...
I figured there would be lawsuits filed years ago in BR 48 when the judge would rule " Finding of No Probable Cause " for cases with less than a gram of narcotics. No matter what the circumstances were for arrest and how the recovery of the narcotics occurred, it would always be finding of no probable cause based solely on weight....
10/13/2017 07:04:00 PM
The smart Coppers got the fuck off the tact teams
years ago when judges started doing this shit regularly.
Actually, the smart Coppers stopped fucking around
with street level narcotics period...
Let the legendary super-heroes in OCD
have ALLLL the grief, headaches and aggravation
that's coming down the pipe courtesy of the
aclu, kim foxx and andy shaw...
Aint no job to big or small cant be covered by a 19 Paul
Anonymous Anonymous said...
Anonymous said...
This can be addressed if a judge finds probable cause first, and then the ASA nolles.
And are you or who do you expect to tell the judge to change his rulings. That I would like to see. Heck, next time the judge rules no probable cause on one of y9ur case, you just stand up there and tell him to change ruling. Then let us know how that turns out
Post a Comment
<< Home