Friday, September 10, 2010

Which Came First?

LAPD is up and running with the "Predictive Policing" thingie. Jack Dunphy writes:
  • Has the future of police work arrived? You might think so if you had read an article that appeared in the August 21 edition of the Los Angeles Times. Running under the headline “Stopping crime before it starts,” the article described recent advances in what is known as “predictive policing,” in which complex mathematical formulas are used to forecast when and where crimes are likely to occur.

  • All of which sounds fine until you realize that a cop who spends too much of his work day staring into a computer screen will spend too little of it looking out the window of his police car for the criminals he has been so sophisticatedly equipped to detect. When I was a rookie cop in the early ‘80s, each day in roll call I was handed a copy of what was called the Daily Occurrence report, known to street cops of the time as the D.O. sheet. Most of the veteran cops I worked with gave it a glance and took note of particulars like vehicle descriptions and license numbers of cars used in crimes, but they had little use for it otherwise. They already knew where the area’s crimes were most likely to occur from having handled the calls themselves and from talking with their colleagues. They also knew where the parolees lived, which, then as now, was most often not where their parole records indicated. More important, they knew when to jump out of the car and put the grab on somebody they could see was up to no good.
Go read the entire article. He mentions a bunch of recent happenings here in Chicago, too.

Labels:

11 Comments:

Anonymous West Side, Inside Do-Nothing said...

"...complex mathematical formulas are used..."

The only formula I have any interest in is as follows:

1st (x12) + 16th (x12) + 22nd (x12) + U.A. (x 3) + D.A. (x 4) / As-Little-As-Possible = Barely Treading Water While Retaining My Freedom, Assets And Sanity.

9/10/2010 12:32:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I would add to this, read the comments under the article, if you choose to click on it.

9/10/2010 01:05:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Predictive policing? Sounds like that movie called "Minority Report"? Hmmm?

9/10/2010 02:41:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

One of the commenters in the LA Times article sums it up very nicely.

Pay close attention to the reference about Harvard Economists not seeing the economic slowdown coming. So much for predictive modeling . . .

"fabian at 2:48 PM August 21, 2010

These folks have a nerve.

Just a couple of years ago ago, the best paid and supposedly most brilliant mathematicians, economists and Harvard MBAs threw us into one of the worst economic crisis since 1930's. Their answer to that mess; there is no way we could have seen it coming.

Now do you really think that a bunch of nerds and cops armed with a meager $3 mil will be able to predict the future? Yeah sure, it's only human behavior.

That is almost funny but what will happen when they'll act upon these 'predictions' is not."

9/10/2010 03:42:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

What foolishness, it is a well-established fact that when you saturate an area with officers you’ll only succeed in displacing the crime. Mister asshole will just go somewhere else less protected to do his business. Unless they believe they can predict within minutes when an event of criminality is going to occur so that officers can swoop in and capture the bad guys none of this holds much promise in affecting crime.

This is just smoke and mirrors to fool the citizens into thinking they’re being protected, just like the video cameras no one is watching.

9/10/2010 07:24:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Complex mathmatical formulas sounds like the idea behind a TV show. So now we emulate "Numbers", "SVU", "CSI". What's next, "Jersey Shore"? Oh yeah, I forgot Teasers.

9/10/2010 07:59:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Maybe they got the idea from the television series, "Numbers" where all problems are solved through the use of numbers. Well, the show has been cancelled and so should the idiots in Chicago that believe in it. Nothing works better than old time policing, getting your asses out on the street and looking for the bad guys.

9/10/2010 08:59:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Brett must go, it is another "failure" 1 of many of j-fleds wtf,hey brett kid when new boss takes over your gone! If you stayed in public sector you would be collecting comp with your stupid ideas! Brett whose clout do you have? The envelope please,how much did you have to pay?

9/10/2010 09:35:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Why not just use 'this' simple computer strategy on JFled until his contract expires early next year...

Control
Alternate
Delete

O'v(r)

9/10/2010 11:54:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

How about we get a new boss who will restore some confidence first. Then let's see what happens. My math says that we would all be much happier and get back to doing our police work.

9/10/2010 11:56:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I predict that there will be little policing done any time soon.....

9/11/2010 03:06:00 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Newer Posts.......................... ..........................Older Posts