Monday, April 04, 2011

E.F.I.S. Answers

From the head of the Board of Ethics himself:
  • Hi everyone,

    I'm not a regular reader of this blog, but I do find it one of the better ones when I do read it. Anyway, I do want to correct a few misconceptions about the "ethics statements." I should know--I'm the Executive Director of the Board of Ethics. Chances are I've talked on the phone to some of you, and in any case you can call me anytime; I'm a department head who answers his own phone. First, filing on line is amazingly easy--that's the way we designed the system. For all CPD personnel, you should be able to log in using your "employee id," which is the same id and password combo (last name and last 4 of ss#, no spaces) you use for our annual ethics training (which, by the way, should be ready this coming week). If that doesn't work, try the same log in and password combo you use when you log into your CPD pc. If THAT doesn't work, please call my office at 312-744-9660. Second, whether you need to in 2011 file depends solely on your 2011 budgeted salary rate, not including any o/t you have or expect to earn. If it's $79,300 or more, you need to file. Third, ALL filed forms are made public, and since 2009, posted on the internet. But your home address is NEVER SHOWN TO THE PUBLIC. My office is hyper-sensitive about this. Older forms, those green ones you filed in paper in 2009 and 2010, have been scanned into our website (and must be searched for by name), but your home address just isn't there. Nor is mine. If you file in paper this year (you can, but why??) we'll scan it in. More work for you, more work for us. But you can if you wish. This year, we have 14,600 filers spread through all City departments and Boards and Commissions, including me, and all these forms are all going on the web. Look, it's reality--get used to it. We're not the only jurisdiction that does this. That's one of the many prices we pay for our public employment, and it's what the reform community likes to call "transparency." Fourth, Mayor Daley's 2009 and 2010 forms and Mayor-elect Rahm Emanuel's 2010 form ARE ON THE WEB (for Emanuel's, look under forms of candidates, since he filed in 2010 as a candidate). Neither has yet filed his 2011 form, but Mayor Daley will, and Mayor-elect Emanuel must (and will) before he's sworn in. When we get 'em, we'll post 'em, just like yours. We don't make any exceptions. Last, I really don't get any thrills out of collecting $20 from my fellow employees, but like you all, I've got to enforce the law. If you want a waiver of the $20 form, please come in to my office and file a waiver form. So, please, do me, yourselves, and my tiny, hard-working staff a favor: file by May 2. Use the $20 you'll save for something more important (and fun).

    Steve Berlin, Executive Director, Board of Ethics, 312-744-9660
Thanks.

Labels:

50 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

How refreshing. Thanks for the info.

Oh, and I've visited the office. The staff really IS tiny, but they're some of the nicest, most helpful, people I've ever encountered in the city bureaucracy.

4/04/2011 12:10:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Sounds like a nice guy. I didn't think there were too many working for the city.

4/04/2011 12:14:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

How can this guy work for the City? He's articulate, helpful, concerned about his staff and other employees and appears to have common sense. Is this a late April Fools joke?
Thanks for the info Sir..Do you happen to have any police experience? Because if they are considering Cortez Trotter maybe you could throw your hat in the ring...

4/04/2011 12:25:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

my hat is off to this guy

4/04/2011 12:27:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

What's the point on filing other than to collect a fine. It does not stop graft and corruption.

4/04/2011 12:30:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Thanks for your honesty

4/04/2011 12:35:00 AM  
Anonymous Westside, Inside Do-Nothing said...

While on the topic of ethical behavior and transparency, I'd like to ask Mr. Steve Berlin, Executive Director, Board of Ethics about just ONE of the things I've discovered about him:

Is it purely coincidence that the law firm of Rudnick & Wolfe, where your biography lists you as an "associate" from October of 1987 to October 1989, scored BIG cash from TIF funds regarding the following?: the contract concerning the Howard Theater, located at 1615-43 W. Howard. Contract #4919. Said contract to run from 1996 thru present day? To the total tune of $ 4,647,059 ???

What was your cut/"Finder's Fee"? Did you report it just once (assuming one lump payment), or do you report in annually as smaller chunks on your ethics statement?

I suggest interested parties do a FOIA request on this and other City of Chicago business steered towards this law firm that was/is "associated" with Mr. Ethics at one time or another. Then...

maybe Google or FOIA request the law firm of Altheimer & Gray (also a former "associate" of Steve Berlin) to see what, if any, City of Chicago business/contracts/TIF money was directed towards this connected group of people.

There's plenty of easily accessible information that doesn't quite pass the "smell test" in regards to this guy. Add him volunteering information via a submission to SCC, and all I have to say is: this dude's rotten. This doesn't even take into account how close he is to Daley and how long he's held his current title.

4/04/2011 01:02:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

why do we have to post our capitol gains from our investments? None of your business.

4/04/2011 01:03:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

What the fuck is the fucking point that is trying to be established by filling these out???

4/04/2011 01:55:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

What is the best and most accurate way to know what is our "2011 budgeted salary rate?"

4/04/2011 02:10:00 AM  
Blogger EP 5-0 said...

I am still having trouble comprehending why we have a Board of Ethics in a City where ethics has ceased to exist!

4/04/2011 02:36:00 AM  
Anonymous Beat 1622 said...

Wow, an administrator who took the time to explain the procedure and one who answers is own phone.
Thank you sir.

Any chance you interested in becoming our next Superintendent?

4/04/2011 05:34:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Does our current ASSHOLE midget mayor ever claim his kickbacks?

4/04/2011 05:55:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Steve, you're a class act. Thanks for taking the time to write in and address our concerns and confusion. I'm quite sure you will end up getting a pass if we ever shall meet.

4/04/2011 07:30:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

A waste of time for 99% of us. The other 1% lies on it anyways.

Tell me Daley, Burke and all of the other Alderman are 100% truthful on theirs.

I have better things to do with my time than click NO for 5 minutes.

4/04/2011 07:39:00 AM  
Anonymous SIDE JOBS? - WHY? said...

So we have to list our side jobs?

How many do we have to list?

These is space for only one.

4/04/2011 07:55:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Perky, isn't he?

---not a cop

4/04/2011 08:08:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

How in the world did a guy, so competant, decent, and seemingly well meaning get a position in Chicago Govt? It had to be a mistake!

4/04/2011 08:36:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I completely agree with you, as public servants we should file this annually to create a more "transparent" government. BUT, what you don't understand you are creating a safety issue for police officers who work secondary employment in order provide for their families. The ordinance requires us to disclose the company, address, and location of where we work and have received more than $2,500 in compensation last year. I am not opposed to disclosing this info and I completely agree that as public servants we should disclose this info. Here is my concern. In years past, if someone wanted to obtain this information, they had to file a written request with your office to receive that information. It was a step than one would have to go through to get this information and your office would then have a record of who was requesting it. This year, you are freely providing this information to anyone who wants to anonymously search for it on the internet by simply typing in a first or last name. This greatly concerns me because I know many officers who work by themselves at their secondary employment. Now if an offender who they arrested really wanted to come after them all they have to do is type in the officer’s name on your website and he has instant access to this info anonymously. There is nowhere in the Illinois Compiled Statutes, the MCC, or the Freedom of Information Act that mandates that the Board of Ethics publicly post this information. In fact, if someone wants this information they MUST request it in writing. Here is the link to the instructions on how to make a request:

www.cityofchicago.org/city/en/depts/ethics/supp_info/ethics_foia.html

My question is why is the Board of Ethics freely posting this information when they don’t have to? In a time that we are in a recession and the city badly needs money, don’t you think that they would charge some kind of fee for requesting this information in order to generate revenue? Please contact Steven Berlin, Executive Director, and Richard Superfine, Legal Counsel, at the Board of Ethics and ask them to explain to you why this is done. I did and they pretty much told me that they are protecting our home address not our work addresses. Unfortunately that is neither here nor there. It is actually easier for someone to find out where I live than where I work through public records so that doesn’t really make a difference. I hope that the unions are doing something about this but urge anyone that is required to file an Ethics statement this year to contact their union in order to get this procedure changed.

4/04/2011 08:49:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

It's interesting the glowing posts of a guy doing what he's supposed to be doing, then the posts outing him as a Daley guy. Oops shoulda kept your important trap shut!

4/04/2011 08:58:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Sounds like a pretty happy government employee. But who in your office will blow the first whistle when the elected officials under report kick backs, handouts and other forms of income from the out going administration?

4/04/2011 08:59:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Beat 1622 said...
Wow, an administrator who took the time to explain the procedure and one who answers is own phone.
Thank you sir.

Any chance you interested in becoming our next Superintendent?

4/04/2011 05:34:00 AM

Boy, are you EASY.

4/04/2011 09:01:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Steve, as long as you're here: Has anybody been convicted for violating the Ethics statements? If not, then why bother?

Seems like a huge waste of time and money making up laws no one enforces.

4/04/2011 09:22:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

This guy is sharp enough to run this dept.

4/04/2011 09:43:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

What is the best and most accurate way to know what is our "2011 budgeted salary rate?"

4/04/2011 02:10:00 AM

-----------------------------------
Go to bureau sites, then to finance division. Once there go to the 2011 salary page and you can see what you (and everyone else) makes annually.

4/04/2011 10:19:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Honest and fair treatment, hey all you other city dept heads, take a hint.

4/04/2011 10:29:00 AM  
Anonymous TIK said...

Just a question, Where is the web page located to do this. I couldnt find it in Iclear. Anybody know? Thanks

4/04/2011 10:58:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

He's not the only one reading your blog Da Mayo & Rahmmy also.

4/04/2011 11:18:00 AM  
Anonymous Hey, I'm Just Sayin, said...

Anonymous said...
What the fuck is the fucking point that is trying to be established by filling these out???

4/04/2011 01:55:00 AM


If someone is getting money from the City, the Daley Crime Family wants them identified so they can kick the "outsiders" to the curb and keep the cash and contracts in the 'family' or to guarantee that the proper kickbacks are being paid!

4/04/2011 12:10:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

X Sport said...
I am still having trouble comprehending why we have a Board of Ethics in a City where ethics has ceased to exist!

4/04/2011 02:36:00 AM


SEE: façade or facade (fəˈsɑːd, fəˈsɑːd)

2. a front or outer appearance, ESPECIALLY A DECEPTIVE ONE.

4/04/2011 12:20:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Board of Ethics? In Chicago? i believe they have never ruled against anyone in their history. Just smoke and mirrors to satisfy the public while the real games go on behind closed doors.

4/04/2011 12:42:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Ethics in Chicago is an oxymoron!

4/04/2011 01:18:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...
What is the best and most accurate way to know what is our "2011 budgeted salary rate?"

4/04/2011 02:10:00 AM

Take one paystub with just your regular salary, no/t, nothing else and multiply by 24. Or go to the department website, go to finance and look it up, or go to your contract. Lots of places to look, just get off of you butt and do it. Don't wait for someone else to spoon feed you.

4/04/2011 02:37:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I want the job of Special events coordinator,I want to make a hundred grand on the side.

4/04/2011 02:37:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...
What is the best and most accurate way to know what is our "2011 budgeted salary rate?"

4/04/2011 02:10:00 AM
===================================
Open up and read your contract. If you are a patrolman with less then 15 yrs on the job it doesn't concern you.

4/04/2011 03:03:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...
How can this guy work for the City? He's articulate, helpful, concerned about his staff and other employees and appears to have common sense. Is this a late April Fools joke?
Thanks for the info Sir..Do you happen to have any police experience? Because if they are considering Cortez Trotter maybe you could throw your hat in the ring...

4/04/2011 12:25:00 AM

==================================
Well if Trotter is being consider he doesn't have any police experience. Either did the clown that just left here either. So why should this guy need any. Besides they won't give it to him because he cares about his workers too much.

I actually think the 14 yr old(Vincent Richardson) that acted as a cop for about 6 hrs should get the job. He already has more experience then Jfled had before during & after he had the job.

4/04/2011 03:09:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Just a question, Where is the web page located to do this. I couldnt find it in Iclear. Anybody know? Thanks

4/04/2011 10:58:00 AM

---

That's because it's not on iClear. Check your CPD email it is in there.

4/04/2011 05:53:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The so-called Howard Theater houses a Korean gym shoe retailer. What good did that do for the community?

4/04/2011 06:21:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I am still having trouble comprehending why we have a Board of Ethics in a City where ethics has ceased to exist!

4/04/2011 02:36:00 AM

amen to that.

4/04/2011 09:00:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

so if i do no overtime and dont work a side job, but i make over that amount i have to fill one of these out???

4/04/2011 09:01:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

why does the public have a right to know that i sold a property or stocks and made more than $5K on the sale? (question no. 8)

4/04/2011 10:56:00 PM  
Anonymous Steve Berlin "ethics steve" said...

Ok. Why do you have to file if your annual base salary is $79.3k or more? Short answer: it's the law. Long answer: every governmental jurisdiction has some kind of ethics disclosure from its employees. Frankly, we may now have too many filers in Chicago, nearly 14,600 this year. Were it up to me, we'd have fewer, and base the criteria for who files on something closer to state law, which is job responsibility. The purpose of these forms is to ferret out potential conflicts of interests. As the late Justice Brandeis wrote: "sunshine is said to be the best of disinfectants." These forms are foia'ed or examined all the time. Why do you have to disclose sources of outside income? Because outside jobs are the source of most of the ethics problems that City people get themselves into. Not necessarily police personnel, but in general, that's been my experience in 17 1/2 years in this job. Why your capital gains or your investment property? Again, this form was not written specifically with police personnel in mind. Do we really need to know that? For someone who invests City funds or inspects property, yes, but not necessarily for CPD personnel.

@Mr.Westside: put your mouth and name where your fingers are, and let's have coffee. Really--you're off the mark. I worked from 1984-1987 at Altheimer & Gray, long before it became a politically connected firm and then croaked in 2003. It was a bunch of really smart, mostly Jewish lawyers who worked 6-7 days a week. I was a kid out of Northwestern Law School doing civil litigation. I worked my ass off, learned a lot about being a professional, had no wife or kids then, and made money. Stupidly, youthfully and arrogantly, I left that firm, then worked for 2 unhappy years at Rudnick, doing franchising work. It was then and still is a firm that grew big on real estate and tif deals, but my work there had nothing to do with that. C'mon: a 29 year punk as a power broker? Get real. Then I left full-time practice and got an MA in ethics at the U of C Div School. Cool place. I have no political connections at all. I got my job by interviewing for it, and was hired as the Deputy in 1993 by Dorothy Eng, from whom I also learned a lot. My brother Bob, who some of you may know, is the DuPage County State's Attorney.

As far as finding people in violation of the law for lying on these forms, well, our law says we have to show that they intentionally filed a false form with the intent to mislead. You guys know how difficult that is. I've been in this business long enough to know that the real "oomph" behind these forms is that they are public; the public can make hay of apparently false answers. And, we'd need a complaint, because would we know someone's lying?

My office is primarily educational and advisory. If you call me, for example, about outside employment, nepotism, or what you can do after you leave the force (if you still wish to work in or around the City), it's confidential, and I'll tell it to you straight. Yes, confidential. No one knows but you and me, If I get a subpoena, I'll file a motion to quash it. Yep, I'm real, and I read blogs, though not this one too often. I need to read the Sun-Times over my morning coffee to find out how my day will go. I've got friends and neighbors who are CPD personnel, and I respect what you do.

As to the addresses of your secondary employment, we are looking into this, and presenting the issue to our Board. We don't know everything, and can't predict everything. We live and learn. We last presented the text of the ethics form to our Board back in 1998. Now that we're in the internet age, it's time for a re-review. We're bound by the wording of the law, but we're smart, creative, and sensitive to your privacy as law enforcement officers.

To file with our efis system, here's the link:
https://webapps.cityofchicago.org/efis/index.html

4/05/2011 12:42:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

how do you sleep at night ?
czar of ethics .... in chicago ?
appointed by machine polititions ? please, give me a break !

4/05/2011 03:16:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Mr. BERLIN Thanks for the information. Sounds like you have our backs.

4/05/2011 08:45:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I worked with Steve at the Board of Ethics from 1998-2005. He's as intelligent, honest and decent as they come. I don't want to speak for him, but I can assure readers of this blog that the annual financial interest filing period was my least favorite part of the job, and I, like Steve, had absolutely no interest in jamming up police officers or charging them $20 late fees. Unfortunately, the Board staff--like any other enforcement or regulatory agency--is tasked with enforcing rules that they did not draft. In an ideal world, as Steve notes, ethics statements would be required based on position and job duties--not salary.

I also note that my favorite part of the job was when I assisted City employees--including numerous police officers--in ensuring that their outside employment, post-City employment or other activities did not run afoul of the often confusing ethics rules. Steve, myself, and all the other staff I worked with during that time, truly believed that our main responisibility was to help employees. And, believe it or not, nobody in that office was clouted in there.

John M

4/05/2011 02:02:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...
What is the best and most accurate way to know what is our "2011 budgeted salary rate?"

4/04/2011 02:10:00 AM

-----------------------------------
Go to bureau sites, then to finance division. Once there go to the 2011 salary page and you can see what you (and everyone else) makes annually.

4/04/2011 10:19:00 AM

Or look at the Salary Schedule publised by the CPD, or simply multiply your semimonthly gross pay by 24. Not rocket science really.

4/05/2011 02:39:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

how do you sleep at night ?
czar of ethics .... in chicago ?
appointed by machine polititions ? please, give me a break !

4/05/2011 03:16:00 AM

-
Some people just need to bitch, and you're one of them.

The guy sounds like one of the most decent people in city government.
Take your bitching elsewhere, or apply it to an issue that actually deserves it.

4/05/2011 04:11:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Thanks for sharing the bit about the default ID & passwords!

4/06/2011 08:00:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I want to WORK for this guy!!!!

4/07/2011 12:57:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I have had the opportunity to work with Steve over the years. He is a straight up hands on guy. And you obviously now know like I do that he doesn't pass the buck. Bravo Steve! Always a pleasure. Jean

4/14/2011 03:00:00 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Newer Posts.......................... ..........................Older Posts