Time Machine - 2003
Remember the last time the CPD followed orders that everyone thought were completely lawful?
- America's eight-year war in Iraq officially ended in December. It took two additional months for the city of Chicago to end its legal battle with demonstrators arrested for protesting on the first day of the conflict.
Actually, the litigation still isn't over. On February 8 the city agreed to pay $6.2 million to settle one lawsuit, Vodak v. City of Chicago, filed by more than 700 protesters. A related case involving another 16 demonstrators and bystanders, Beal v. City of Chicago, is expected to be settled soon for $2 million to $3 million.
In addition, the city spent at least $3.8 million on outside legal help, records show. That brings the total cost of fighting these cases to roughly $12 million.
It was dicey for a while, but not a single officer paid punitive damages.
Does anyone really think that would be the case if it happened today?
Perhaps we missed it working the hours we do, but has Legal Affairs come out with any sort of bulletin about this order by the governor? There are procedures in place for emergencies, but we aren't sure those hurdles have been cleared in the legal sense of the word. Just because Groot and Fat-Ass say something doesn't negate the procedures and legal steps. There are deadlines and limitations and restrictions on what can and cannot be done and no one in the media seems to be asking any of these questions.
You know who asks these questions? Plaintiff lawyers. The ACLU. Federal Judges. And if they're asking, does anyone think that Groot will be sitting at the defense table with you?
Does anyone really think that would be the case if it happened today?
Perhaps we missed it working the hours we do, but has Legal Affairs come out with any sort of bulletin about this order by the governor? There are procedures in place for emergencies, but we aren't sure those hurdles have been cleared in the legal sense of the word. Just because Groot and Fat-Ass say something doesn't negate the procedures and legal steps. There are deadlines and limitations and restrictions on what can and cannot be done and no one in the media seems to be asking any of these questions.
You know who asks these questions? Plaintiff lawyers. The ACLU. Federal Judges. And if they're asking, does anyone think that Groot will be sitting at the defense table with you?
Labels: info for the police
posted by SCC at 12:07 AM
56 Comments:
OLA did come out with a Legal Bulletin regarding enforcing said Order. I find. It strange they have you enforcing an Order from the State by citing people with a violation of City Ordiances. Why not an ILCS charge?
i was there in 2003 and incompetent bosses chiefs and above ordered the arrest of people going home from work, an idiot could see these people were not demonstrators, then no boss admitted to this but they all retired and left everybody hanging. it was the stupidest thing i ever saw.
How long before there is a video of police actually bothering to try to enforce this illegal "order" and the media and civic groups side with the members of the public who (I believe rightfully) challenge the legality of this much infringement of basic liberties?
how long before the accusation is made that the enforcement of the order disproportionately targeted one group more than others?
and how long before little thing throws you to the wolves and drops the charges AFTER someone in uniform was dumb enough to bother?
Did you see gov. JumBo at his news conference today? He said anybody who doesn't take this pandemic seriously should "walk into a hospital" and check out the victims. Moron doesn't realize that all hospitals are locked down? Dumber than he is fat.
Legit question here. When stopping a jogger, walker, cyclist, etc... Wouldn’t this require an ISR at the very least? We would be stopping (detainment) and taking away their freedom of movement, at the very least movement of where they want to get to. My understanding after going to Force Mitigation and Use of Force is this is a 4th Amendment issue.
So all you units out there taking part in the shut it down movement should get some clarification. Me, I plan to do one for every one of them I have to talk to. I work in the area most effected on the lakefront. The place where people would actually pay for these citations. I will spend my first couple of hours giving out verbal warnings and the next 6 after lunch doing ISRs on the John/Jane Doe “violators”.
Also, my message to each one is to “remember this come election time, you healthy people are a risk and the problem but travel on the CTA is not”. I get mostly good responses from each one of them.
If you approach a group of 10 or more and stand there until they move after giving them an order to move.....that's and ISR....Follow the ball.... You observe a crime taking place and you then perform an investigation to determine that an emergency is not taking place which would validate their need to congregate.
Total mess. The Democrats have created a disaster that the police cannot solve due to an ISR and BWC that double documents an officer violating the 1st Amendment to publicly assemble to worship Allah, the Devil, of Je_us Chri_t.
You can read the governor’s executive order online. It’s about 20 pages long and doesn’t lay out any enforcement policy or penalties whatsoever. Obviously they just blindly passed the order and left gaping holes in legal procedures to be filled up by the local municipality’s legal departments later (big mistake and blatantly unconstitutional). Officers...please don’t get sucked in by the governor and mayor’s power-trip, Don’t be a legal guinea pig either. History will not be kind to this unconstitutional executive order.
Brothers and sisters, DO NOT put yourself in the trick bag by following an illegal order.
Some of the things they are asking for are violations of multiple amendments.
You are going to put yourself in a very bad situation violating someone’s civil rights.
It’s not worth it.
I think today those offices involved would be taking another mortgage out on the house to pay dem punitives. The future looks nice don’t it
"...does anyone think that Groot will be sitting
at the defense table with you?"
Hell...
To the m/fin' no he/she/it ain't
gonna sitting at the defense table
with the Copper stupid enough to
enforce these progressive/nanny-statist,
fraught with legal peril "orders" that
Groot and Guv'nuh Great (as in large) Ass
are farting out.
But you can bet your ass that COPA, GAPA,
Kim Foxx, the ACLU and local media will
be sitting across from you at the prosecution
table just-a-grinnin' at your big, dumb, blue
ass for citing/arresting some poor "citizen"
just minding their own business.
The verdict will be YOU getting warm
progressive sunshine poured down your ass.
Nobody else...
Groot is full of shit with this artfully crafted
trick-bag some idiot Copper would be more than
willing to climb into.
Groot is the the municipal corporate CEO
and chief law enforcement officer thereof.
If people in the park get her nose so far
out of joint then Groot itself can sign out
an ANOV book and effect the arrest when such
put upon citizen crams the silly thing in
Groots ass upside down and sideways.
Protect yourselves and your families from THEM.
Give them NOTHING to hurt YOU and YOUR families with.
Groot y Cia. talk big, long and hard shit about
"Constitutional Policing" until it's actually done.
Groot will be shitting itself and pulling out it's
already thinning/receding hair when Dude Inc.
REALLY shows all that ass with the advent of warmer weather.
"WHOOOOOOO!"
Whither thus and what the fuck then?
The sure to occur worst case scenario?
50+ cabin fevered m/fers in a house party and the very peoples
and folkses who hate The Police the most, call The Police
to "do something" about it...
Heh...
Police show up and every muthafuckin' door on
that block bangs open and the deluge begins.
Sheee-yaht...
It'll be like one of the 'jets going up
(or coming down if you prefer) like back
in the 80's and 90's.
"But we DID NOT tell our Police Officers to do THAT..."
Groot has no worries because it surely won't
be Groot getting bent over the rail of
"Police Accountability" and other revanchist
nonsense.
Yeah... But there some poor "just following orders"
slob of a Cop sitting at the defense table all the
fuck alone over this silly shit.
Again... Protect yourselves from THEM.
Police Like You Have No Friends.
Look.
Point & Laugh.
Leave.
"does anyone think that Groot will be sitting at the defense table with you?"
Only if that table is the kids table due to it's lower height... Otherwise, with no booster seat around, the answer is NO!
This is the solemn oath that we took when we became police officers: "I, [name], having been appointed to the office of Police Officer, City of Chicago, do solemnly swear that I will support the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of Illinois, and that I will faithfully discharge the duties of the office of Police Officer according to the best of my abilities."
Amendment 1 to the Constitution of the United States: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. Article I, Section 9, clause 2 of the Constitution states, "The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it." Habeas Corpus is the right of any person to petition the court to challenge any detention that they believe to be unlawful. No law has been enacted that requires any person to stay inside of their residence or to refrain from public or private gatherings, as such a law would be deemed unconstitutional. A mayoral proclamation has no force of law and this is actually an unlawful order on it’s face. Title 18, U.S.C., Section 242 - Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law: This statute makes it a crime for any person acting under color of law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom to willfully deprive or cause to be deprived from any person those rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution and laws of the U.S. Acts under "color of any law" include acts not only done by federal, state, or local officials within the bounds or limits of their lawful authority, but also acts done without and beyond the bounds of their lawful authority; provided that, in order for unlawful acts of any official to be done under "color of any law," the unlawful acts must be done while such official is purporting or pretending to act in the performance of his/her official duties. This definition includes, in addition to law enforcement officials, individuals such as Mayors, Council persons, Judges, Nursing Home Proprietors, Security Guards, etc., persons who are bound by laws, statutes ordinances, or customs. Punishment varies from a fine or imprisonment of up to one year, or both, and if bodily injury results or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire shall be fined or imprisoned up to ten years or both, and if death results, or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death. Title 18, U.S.C., Section 241 - Conspiracy Against Rights: This statute makes it unlawful for two or more persons to conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person of any state, territory or district in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him/her by the Constitution or the laws of the United States, (or because of his/her having exercised the same). Punishment varies from a fine or imprisonment of up to ten years, or both; and if death results, or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years, or for life, or may be sentenced to death.
Go ahead and arrest citizens for peaceably assembling. Loevy and Loevy are looking forward to their kickbacks for political contributions, I mean settlements.
So we have a Mayor who ran on the "Social Justice" platform and promised "Police reform because the bad police officers were out there violating peoples rights because people were getting shot and killed in Chicago.
Some likened the shootings and killing to a "pandemic"...
Now the Mayor, a former Federal Prosecutor, wants those same police to go out and violate peoples rights because people are getting sick and dying?
Have I got this right?
We still have a Constitution in this country, but a little thing like that doesn't matter to the leftist democratic socialists who will seize on any opportunity to grab power and keep it. And to those that say we wont' have any freedoms if we don't have a life, let me remind you of the state motto of New Hampshire, one of the original 13 colonies. LIVE FREE OR DIE.
" I wufs only following ordus"
They asked the Sup about the legality of arresting people and he said something like, "there is a very big law that says stuff." never answered the question. It is not legal because there is no law making a gubernatorial proclamation binding. At some point they will try to pressure you into making an arrest and if you don't, I'm sure they will do bad things to you. Not the best of situations.
SCC, you nailed it again.
I still can't fathom why the go-getters and the merit picks can't understand that if you detain, write an ANOV, or (God forbid, arrest), some law-abiding citizen minding his own business just walking down the street, that PO is violating that person's civil rights.
Never mind going into someone's abode doing the same.
That PO and everyone on the paper will lose everything they own and lose their job.
And the chumps who were protesting will get an insignificant payout. The lawyers with all their legal work will cash in and be the real winners. Its time some intrepid investigators start exposing the corrupt lawyers who make a living with frivolous lawsuits. These greedy and morally bankrupt lawyers are reallocating much needed revenues for the public schools re-education facilities, nutritional sustenance in the inner city disadvantaged youth and health care right funding for children of migrants. Shame on you greedy lawyers.
Officers do not make arrests for the undeclared Marshall Law. The stress put on you by the lawsuits will result in coronary failures and worse. The people who you will encounter cannot obey the law in the first place. Don't be that officer caught up in the legal switches and potentially give the lawless parasite class a huge payout. Society knows you are doing the right things, but the legal system is so corrupted by attorneys and judges alike who profit from civil disobedience. If you took all the civil litigation resulting from unlawful acts paid for by the taxpayers and its consequences out of the law game, we would once again have an orderly society. Judicial actions and encouragement to challenge an orderly society from "civil rights" minded lawyers ensure the public monies will be diverted into their profitable calculated legal schemes.
Lawyers, greed, social justice themes and lucrative taxpayer funded payouts are a tempting volatile cocktail which encourage anarchy, lawlessness and social unrest in society time and time again. Just remember the areas who voted in democrat candidates. Obviously these voters are not yet ready for the hope and change transformational stuff to keep their communities safe. Voters should have embraced bi-partisan political party strategies or grass roots electoral diversity by electing common sense, other than the mandatory party controlled candidates.
Democrats have the power to do so much more than a Republican can. Obey your kind hearted overlords. Be greatful Rauner lost.
https://www.illinoispolicy.org/what-powers-does-pritzker-have-in-an-emergency-and-what-has-he-ordered-so-far/
In the case of an epidemic like COVID-19, Illinois governors are given a wide range of emergency powers for a limited period of time.
In the last two weeks, Gov. J.B. Pritzker has issued a series of executive orders in response to the spread of the COVID-19 virus in Illinois.
We need 2 get thousands of people to protest at Braindeads house in 014 the cops couldn't arrest all of them, let it happen and good luck! U will need 2 types of Id's 2 attend?
Free parking and a job fair after the event.
SCC that exactly what I was thinking with all this bullshit. Bossholes and Groot telling you to do this and that which you know is not right and they do this this because they know years from now it will be you and only you sitting at the Fed courthouse defending yourself.
And that goes for shit that happens before this shit hit the fan and will caontinue to happen after this blows over. Think for yourself, remember its you and only you who have to answer to shit you did on the bosses or Groots order so keep that in mind. Especially keep in mind the above assholes hate you and will never have your back.
3/27/2020 04:14:00 AM
Yes sir! Excellent post. They are typical liberals, which means they are typical hypocrites.
I support the governor and mayor and I will do....bwahahshaha! I could not even finish writing that bullshit! If those two idiots want somebody arrested for non-social distancing, they can do it themselves!
The Illinois Attorney General should be asking these questions and should issue his legal opinion, that is, if he is able to ever have one, being a political hack of Madigan that is.He is strangely silent.I would do nothing except a verbal warning until this legal opinion surfaces and it becomes an order from the department. " I was following orders" as an excuse for your actions has not worked since the Nuremberg Trials.
The first test case is coming.
According to the news March 26 had 50 citations issued and one arrested in accordance with this order. Good luck with that. Issue the verbal warning, do the ISR and go about your business.
On the tv news, they showed a copper get out of his squad and start opening a ticket book as he was approaching a jogger. What ever happened to the procedure of persuading, advising, warning, before an arrest/ticket is done? Don’t they teach how to make friends anymore?
Is a ticket that important?
Wonder why people walk past as someone is getting their ass kicked.....
The end game of this is nothing more than a big payout for another shyster law firm and police officers losing their jobs and being hit with civil lawsuits. Do not enforce any of these ideas that Fats and Frog lady pull from their collectively corrupted anal cavities. 19P all these nonsense calls about "too many people in the park" and "crowd gathered outside". The people calling are even bigger police haters than those on the streets anyway. This is what they voted for - enjoy!
“ Excuse me deer, the Supreme Court has roundly rejected prior restraint.” Walter Sobchak
So when you refuse a direct order and your supervisor spar's you, what should you do?
Beyond, calling the FOP.
Lori, Lori, there you go again, asking you Policce to put their ass on the line for your Big EGO, when are you going to wake up, tell us what the Fuck have you done to protect your Women and Men in Blue. We are waiting?
The training bulletin is ridiculous especially the football game example. And they’re pushing MCC disorderly conduct even though our peace can’t be breached.
Commanders lead from the front
Have Groot with a soap box and a megaphone with LA Charlie and clear the streets. She has the authority to do so.. so do the 40 aldercreatures.
I remember that night well. Had a gang team and we were on stand by all day. Listened over the City Wide and all the bosses were calling in crowd sizes all over the place. The context is that 1st Deputy JT had recently passed away and all the “bosses” were unsure of their upward mobility or sustainability, keeping their spot so no one wanted to make the call. Fast forward to the wee hours on Michigan Ave with thousands of people, some protesters and some legit. I was with my team about 15 feet away from these gold star clowns and they were like whirling dervishes, literally walking in circles, NOT wanting to make a decision. They literally were afraid to make a call fearing for their potential upward mobility. After a few hours of indecisiveness the call came out, and my team was designated an Arrest team and were ordered to start locking em up. What a fiasco. We did what we were ordered to do and guess what happened? Yep, the lawsuits, the depositions and you know what? Not one, not one boss who ordered us to initiate the arrests was there at the depositions. So let me tell you, DO NOT, DO NOT lock anyone up during this time or you not only will get sued but the city will leave you out to dry. Better yet, never get out of the car.....
What is the exact charge? And don't tell me reckless conduct, city or state. I would think most lawyers would make a case that unless you have been diagnosed with Covid you cannot be reckless to be out on the public way. And if I standing within 6 feet of my wife while taking a walk, what's that charge if we don't space ourselves out? Anyone know?
I see all these opinions from all you legal experts on what not to do with these "unconstitutional orders" So let's hear YOUR plan of action for when an officer is faced with the following situation.(Because it's happening)
A commander drives by a corner, sees 20 dudes hanging out, tells sgt to get a car to give a new "covid dispersal" Sgt calls you over to do it. Now although I disagree with giving the "order", there's really not any damages or individuals restricted, so just grab your event number & move on, some gray area but not thinking much lawsuit chances. Now what happens when that same commander drives by later, sees the same crowd, calls the sgt to get you back there to fine, possibly arrest any/all of the crowd for "violating" the order you gave them earlier? We all understand that the gov/mayor/commander will probably not be sitting at the defense table with you, but How do you online scholars propose the officer proceeds? Are you suggesting the officer tells a commander "No, I refuse to cite/arrest them because I believe the order is unconstitutional" Do we officers have attorneys standing by (like the people we arrest surely will) when we are taken off the street, stripped, possibly/probably fired for "refusing a direct order" however unlawful "WE" believe that order to be? People can wait years of court trials to be paid (or not) for police actions. What are WE supposed to do in the mean time if we refuse direct orders and get stripped for it, while waiting to see how the constitutionality of all this plays out. Seems like you're screwed (later) if you arrest and screwed (now) if you don't. Can some attorneys share their info or get in contact with officers so if I HAVE to refuse an order at least we have a viable threat, with an attorney, of a lawsuit against any boss that orders you to arrest. I hope the bosses are smart enough not to put ANY of us in this situation, but as we can all attest, the best & brightest are NOT usually bosses in CPD.
Notice how the federal government has not issued any stay at home or lockdown orders? Why? Most of them have read the constitution. I would suppose one of the ways to get something like this would be for a judge to issued an injunction or court order. Otherwise, i think there may be a problem. And what about the crowded corners on the west and south sides? Everyone there in compliance?
None of this makes sense because its made up shit. State law not in sync with city regulations vise versa. The Police are directed to enforce bull shit legal mumbo jumbo by two fuckin stupid and lame officials. The morbid obese Gov. and the little wanna be neo Reichstag leader, is threatening to arrest you for exercising your constitutional rights, she mean business. I hope the image of the little shit staring into the camera and in the most ugliest of ways saying, "we - will - arrest - you". Well Madam Mayor, stays with everyone. We salute you with the one finger salute.
We will not arrest anyone under the color of law that is contrary to the Constitution and our oath of office. You and Beck can do that.
Save the theatrics for Dude, Inc. and the killing fields of the south and west sides. Sense January 1st we have suffered approximately 30+ kills a month. March still has a few days left. The Chines Virus has killed less people in the city than the Dude in the same time fame. And you're threatening us with arrests? You are not only delusional but you are a liar and a fraud.
Go back to the Community and tell them to stop killing each other or "we - will - arrest - you". And by the way kick Kim Foxx in the ass to start prosecuting killers and shooters. You supported her.
If it comes down to it Ladies and Gentlemen...
Stick to the Title 8 ordinance. Write the Ticket and tell them to get the F out of the Park.
Do your Best to avoid a "Refused Lawful Order Arrest" and just write That Ticket.
Then help them into the squad and drive them gently to the entrance/exit of the park.
Admonish them with kind words, since the BWC will no doubt be on, and extoll them to avoid the park district propteries until at least May 1st @ 6am or else they are at risk for more ticketing and court dates at such time as the Covid19 pandemic is past.
Or just stay in your squad and watch netflix.
Which ever works best for you all.
OLA did come out with a Legal Bulletin regarding enforcing said Order. I find. It strange they have you enforcing an Order from the State by citing people with a violation of City Ordiances. Why not an ILCS charge?
=============
that way the city can collect the fine for itself. follow the money.
"What?..We never gave orders for the CPD to arrest people that were going to the grocery store,CVS,Walgreens,or picking up food at a restaurant,walking their dog..We would never ever do that!..It's illegal and a violation of civil rights..We advise anyone to bring a lawsuit against those police officers and to ask for punitive damages.."..Go ahead hard-chargers,Mayor Lightgroot has your back..😂😂
I’m in 011, and I’m absolutely not telling any of these shitbags to go home. I’m not writing ANOVs or arresting people for it. I’m not their long lost daddy, you want to stay outside during a pandemic, go ahead. Their health isn’t my concern. The goblin mayor forgave a bunch of debt to the city via tickets, now she’s saying don’t write tickets, but you do want me to write ANOVs to people standing on the corner? That makes no sense. According to progressives we have overcrowding in jail and it’s too many people of color for non violent offenses, but now you want me to lock people up for not being home? Also makes no sense. Didn’t we just empty over 1000 inmates from jail to keep them safe from the virus? Now you want me to potentially lock those same people back up again? Pardon me if I’m confused by the message the city wants to send. If you look at the policies you’d think our leaders were schizophrenic.
“.....there will come a day where you will cry out for the enforcement of the law, there will come a day where you cry out for the law to be the foundation of this republic. So you be careful what you do with the law today, because you weaken it today, and you weaken it forever.”- Trey Gowdy.
There might be protection under federal laws and courts - but this is strictly Cook County where law firms jump over each other for uncontested settlements....and with settlements, there’s donors. We got this frivolity thing and it’s f-cking golden.
He is a fool and way over his capabilities. Saying goofy stuff is for the fear mongering media and in line with what Fatso and Little Boy are selling. Fear works on the dumb and illiterate. Use your head, common sense and approved procedures. Yes human nature being what it is we tend to congregate once we put down the iphones and such. The tough talk compared to the straight talk by Cuomo is striking. Although Cuomo is starting to get whinny again. At least he's not selling fear.
Chicago Pols and media mongrels want to "lock it down" for China Virus but not a word about 30 killings per month city-wide. That's just routine business in Chicago.
So what code/ILCS do we write on the Citation or Arrest Report🧐
Anonymous Anonymous said...
How long before there is a video of police actually bothering to try to enforce this illegal "order" and the media and civic groups side with the members of the public who (I believe rightfully) challenge the legality of this much infringement of basic liberties?
how long before the accusation is made that the enforcement of the order disproportionately targeted one group more than others?
and how long before little thing throws you to the wolves and drops the charges AFTER someone in uniform was dumb enough to bother?
3/27/2020 12:31:00 AM
Exactly!!
Like yesterday’s Chicago Fibune’s subliminal front page photo of all the lawless White folks not practicing social distancing by bike riding, walking, dog walking sitting together on a bench across the 606 trail. Then you continue to story inside-oh, there’s a police officer questioning a black male in Lincoln Park while other people (whites in particular) go about their business...
It bears mention that an attorney friend of ours refers to the mayor as "Larry Leftfoot".
We respectfully submit that SCC consider adopting this nomenclature.
This friend also had face-to-face dealings with the current governor, but I'm afraid that the manners my grandmother ingrained in me will not let me repeat his terms associated with JB.
That whole mess was single handedly caused by Mauer and his huge ego. He turned that into a mess and was wrong all the way in how he handled that. Worst boss ever who fooled way too many people into believing he was great. Just a juiced up clout baby who was never the real police, just told good stories and always had good spots .
Anonymous Anonymous said...
They asked the Sup about the legality of arresting people and he said something like, "there is a very big law that says stuff." never answered the question. It is not legal because there is no law making a gubernatorial proclamation binding. At some point they will try to pressure you into making an arrest and if you don't, I'm sure they will do bad things to you. Not the best of situations.
3/27/2020 05:00:00 AM
Actually he brought up two sections of the reckless conduct law this would fit under. You obviously did not watch the press conference Thursday. During that same Q and A an asshole female white reporter asked about police/public relations already being bad and how this “harassment” could do more harm. He actually did a good job of sternly correcting her. He explained officers enforcing the law is not harassment dispute certain groups and her thinking so.
The whore lawyers strike again. The protestors are mostly mia and the holes will pocket the money. Fucking vultures from LaSalle street
FOX 32 identified Ziman, aurora PD Chief, has contracted China Flu. Best and speedy recovery.
OLA did come out with a Legal Bulletin regarding enforcing said Order. I find. It strange they have you enforcing an Order from the State by citing people with a violation of City Ordiances. Why not an ILCS charge?
=============
that way the city can collect the fine for itself. follow the money.
3/27/2020 11:35:00 AM
And/or so said charge shall be dismissed upon hearing date so neither State nor City bear being the bad guy. But you office (insert here)
commander drives by a corner, sees 20 dudes hanging out, tells sgt to get a car to give a new "covid dispersal" Sgt calls you over to do it. Now although I disagree with giving the "order", there's really not any damages or individuals restricted, so just grab your event number & move on, some gray area but not thinking much lawsuit chances. Now what happens when that same commander drives by later, sees the same crowd, calls the sgt to get you back there to fine, possibly arrest any/all of the crowd for "violating" the order you gave them earlier? We all understand that the gov/mayor/commander will probably not
Ha Ha silly Commander, trying to find out how to do your job :D only best and the brightest
Post a Comment
<< Home