Saturday, September 09, 2006

Look! We're Famous Again

From the comments sections, someone pointed out that one of our previous title holders of "The World's Stupidest Human Being" has written a new article, this time taking our website to task. She cherry picks certain comments and attributes them to Police Officers and even consults a clinical professor of law to offer a diagnosis on one particularly disturbed comment without offering any context at all (another typical leftist ploy to attack opinions they disagree with). The newest article of hers can be located here.

In our own defense, we didn't start moderating comments until a couple of months ago. This site was quite a bit more free wheeling than one would see nowadays. We still can't prove that every visitor here is a cop, let alone a Chicago Police Officer. We get hits from as far away as Australia on a regular basis. Europe and Asia provide us the occasional readers also. We're worldwide baby!

But we'll stand by our description of her. She is amazingly naive and full of guilt about maybe possibly running over a kid who would have gladly slit her throat for an automobile. And now she is trying to use this website as proof that cops are disturbed, cops revel in pointless death, cops peddle vitriol and racism. She attempts to cover her hit job by saying things like she would never "paint all cops with one broad brush" but then she offers up comments she can't even prove originated in this hemisphere as coming from Police and she even manages to mention Jon Burge along with us. We're flattered.

An open letter to Susy: You made a big mistake once upon a time and were lucky to escape with your life. By all rights, you should be maimed or dead. We won't go into the liberal insanity of assuming the best in every human being and being completely isolated from reality. Your feeble attempt to slander and smear CPD Officers by quoting anonymous postings on a free, open and public website that has readers on four continents is sad beyond measure. You are coming to battle completely unarmed and even worse, deliberately blindfolded. Thanks for the free publicity though. We owe you a dinner or something. As soon as we sell a few ads, we'll actually have money for a gift certificate. Tell Bill Dwyer we said "hi," and we look forward to appearing in his column one of these days. Did you see we made "The Reader" last week? Can you maybe mention us to a few "right" leaning publications? Karl Rove seems to have dropped the ball on that front. Thanks.

40 Comments:

Blogger coldtype said...

SCC I don't quite know how to break this to you but a great deal of the posters on this cite put us all in a bad light. Yes, some of the posters may be civilan posers, but for the most part (in your gut I'm sure you know this) most of them are fellow cops. Dumb cops. This would of course explain why you moderate the cite the way you do now.

I thought Suzy took a foolish risk but there is a way to point that out without resorting to juvenille personal attacks. Stay safe.

9/09/2006 12:39:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

TO: Suzie Snowflake

SUBJECT: You are a moron

The government is not here to be the babysitter of the community. It does not take a village idiot to raise our children as Billary Clinton has told us in the past. It’s still sad that after almost getting raped and murdered that you still stand up for these ass*oles. When will you learn? NEVER, because you are a dummycrat.

9/09/2006 12:59:00 AM  
Anonymous Not a police officer said...

Couldn't of said it better. Shame on her!!

9/09/2006 01:22:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Dear SCC, Last week I had to bring my little guy to the Dr.s office and while waiting I saw Ms. Schultz mag on the table. Of course knowing who she was I decided to take a look see and discovered her ranting on about SCC. Thought about dropping you a line concerning it but figured whats the difference? No one would be able to convince her otherwise.
Funny thing though....most liberals will define a conservative as "a liberal that was a victim of a crime". Ms. Schultz proves that wrong. Maybe the definition of a liberal should be "a conservative that got caught breaking the law"

9/09/2006 01:42:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

If bail was set at $1,500,000.00 to $3,000,000.00, what do you think the bond is going to be for the sticky finger coppers from prostitution. Word is the Feds have them on tape with very sticky fingers. And since they will be going to Federal Court... Oh My... Can you say NO BAIL?

From video images to a former prostitution officer wearing a wire to get her move and reward, I would say you will see big bails and charges that include the Federal Ricco Act. Thus not only criminal charging but mandatory confiscation of their USC and personal property gained by their illegal actions.

I think this will be a bigger stinker than S.O.S. bt far.

9/09/2006 01:52:00 AM  
Blogger dilligaf said...

"But the moment we choose to disreguard them completely and label"

Oooooooh Suuuuuuuzy, do those fancy computers you use have spell check???? BTW what is so clinical about law that they need someone to research it, let alone teach it?
There is nothing black and white about legislation, enforcement and interpretation of law. Having an over-schooled attorney opine on psychology is like asking a butcher to give the reasons why Kant's categorical imperative cannot prove the existence of god.

9/09/2006 03:00:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"It's frightening," Futterman says. "You can't ignore the real racism that exists in society or on the police force. The moment we start labeling our children as animals or juvenile predators, instead of children, we have a real serious problem."

The above quote from the article I find disturbing. This professor has no idea that these so called kids are adults before they are teenagers. They are not children, THEY ARE PREDATORS. As far as calling them animals, hey if it looks like a goose, walks, like a goose, then make it fois gras.

9/09/2006 05:39:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

HA HA HA next time you get robbed call the parents of the poor child .but they probably have to get special permission from the warden to accept you're call.



GOD BLESS OUR TROOPS AT HOME AND ABROAD

9/09/2006 06:33:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

and this very BLOG site has to be word verified and comments screened because maybe, just maybe some members of The CPD has taken their personal hatred, dislikes to a level that is at the very least questionable...it's one thing when idiots like this attempt to hide their identity with anonymous postings, BUT when the creator
of this blog site attempts to shelter himself and other allege members of CPD, by eluding to the far fetched belief that on an open BLOG, the possibilities of people other then Police Officers are responsible for some of these unsavory comments. THIS is SCC Blog, wheter you know it or not, these comments reflect this blog site and the people it was develope for.........its called waking up in the real world. Evidently the nonsense got so much that even YOU SCC, had to take steps, from alot of these embarassing comments, COPS or no COPS.

9/09/2006 08:07:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Id be the frst to donate Suzy money to hire a lawyer and take you to task....YOU (SCC) allowed abuse and racism for months to run without any restraints...YOU should be held responsible. Id laugh my ass off if you ended up in litigation someday from this gossip site.

9/09/2006 08:47:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Dear Susy....wake the "F" up!


Susy says.......
It horrified me that these children could be so easily dismissed. They were not worthy of attention.

Dear Susy, these arent children. They are home grown animals that learn their traits from their parent(s). If you were so worried why didnt you go back to help the little darlings? Then they could of finished the job and you know for a fact you probably wouldnt be here tree hugging like a usual liberal idiot. These so called children as you called them would of killed you for sure. You were almost at the pearly gates. That means nothing to you does it?

Definition if a yuppy bleeding heart liberal. SOMEONE WHO HAS NOT YET BEEN A VICTIM.

9/09/2006 10:01:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Oh boy let the hammering begin!

9/09/2006 10:06:00 AM  
Blogger CalumetCopper said...

To: Susy Schultz

From: Ofcr *. ******

Subject: Reality Check

R/O felt compelled to state a few facts to you.
1. You could have died.
2. Children CAN be The Animal.
3. Take off your rose colored glasses and step out of Mr. Roger's Neighborhood and look around.
4. No Animal is a kid of mine.
5. I will not be blamed for 'kids' getting shot/killed by me after trying to rob/carjack/etc. good citizens. Kids make adult decisions, kids live with adult concequences, one of which is death, which I will administer.
6. The Ghetto is what the ghetto does, regardless of color/age.

Signed,

*. ******


APPROVED:

The C.P.D.___

Common Sense_

The Right____

9/09/2006 10:44:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

COLDTYPE....Your dumb, it's site not cite !! Oh yeah, have a nice day !!

9/09/2006 11:04:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Racism on the police department ! Did you say racism ? F*ck off you #^@$%*(^^&^^&&#@##@#^ !! OH YEAH, Have a nice day !!

9/09/2006 11:06:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

You "IDIOTS" are embracing SCC as if he did something courageous by monitoring this site. He did it to save his / her own ass. For months SCC allowed unfounded allegations, racism, rumors, and lies to fester and grow. If SCC is "The Police" I'm assuming very young on the job, educated, and really without a social life outside of this site. SCC has to stay anonymous because as many people who like this site, I'd bet there are just as many who wouldn't mind having a face to face "bar room" talk with SCC. Also if SCC is the police SCC would be held accountable by CPD rules and regulations. Meaning the department would surely find rule violations on an ongoing basis. SCC is NOT a hero, but a coward who hides behind "Anonymous" and the lies and racism of others. I will always respond to "an officer needs help call" thats how I was raised on this job. I just wouldnt mind seeing SCC bitched slapped as I arrived on the scene. I would assist, kick the bad guys ass,& lockem up. Then maybe SCC could put some more gossip on the site for the young officers to enjoy. PS SCC if you want to look up my IP address and keep it between just the two of us, we probably could have a great face to face discussion.

9/09/2006 11:19:00 AM  
Blogger uberjaeger said...

Looks like we struck a cord. Awesome!

9/09/2006 12:00:00 PM  
Blogger DaleyforMCCguest said...

Want to know why we have no support from the community? Look no farther. I hate to use someone else’s analogy (Lt. Col. Grossman), but as the sheep dogs and protectors in society, I think it's gotten to the point where some of us are resenting the sheep (Suzie) and not remembering it is our job to watch over them, not ridicule them. The sheep already don't trust us, but there is no reason to treat them like they are here for US. It's not that way. We are here for THEM. Yes, all of them, but we are here for the wolves in a different way. They are the ones we punish. For those of us in 016, do you want me to tell your family that they were fucking idiots or morons for letting the gypsy into their house to use the phone? Or that leaving the car doors unlocked is asking for a theft. Is that going to help the situation? Let Suzie go. She acknowledges that she didn't do the smart thing in that incident. Keep busting her chops at the risk of looking like Grade A assholes.

9/09/2006 12:30:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

i dont know who scc is and i dont care to know to 11:19 you are a fu@$ing idiot. i appreciate the work he does and he probably doesnt hear that enough. besides if it werent for scc u probably wouldnt have anything to do either. look at your long post you obviously dont have a life yourself. scc might not tell you who he is but i will tell you who i am . how can you wish to see another p.o. get bitch slapped? you are a coward in my book. tell me the bar i would love to sit down and have a drink with you . YOU J>O>

9/09/2006 01:15:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Futterman is part of the MacArthur Justice Center at University of Chicago who sues the Chicago Police Department all the time. She failed to point out that. He and Locke Bowman (who left there recently to go to that Northwestern legal team) have made tens of millions from the city. His comments are biased, but Suzy fails to point out this.

P/S And how did Suzy learn of this site? The retired sergeant sent her the information about comments posted. He has done this in the past and sooner or later, SCC, this will come back to bite you on the ass.

9/09/2006 02:21:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Regarding Suzie, Suzie glad you're ok, glad you're family still has you around, hundreds of people telling you it was a bad choice and you could have been dead are not all wrong and you're the only one right. When I entered my career I was exposed to a level of living that you don't see in movies or books. It shocked me beyond all belief how children are treated by thier own family on a regular basis. The police, though I know it sounds callous and cold have to think this way for mental survival, thier exposure to this tragedy is every day face to face. Thier hands are tied. Parents have rights more than children, whole communities don't respect each other as a neighbor let alone their kids, DCSF has proven itself time and time again to be a failure, children are not reading in school, but know how to riot every single day of the school year. When a group of 10 small children 11yos and under can chain a live dog to a fence, pour gas on him, and light the fire for entertainment, don't cry for the dog. Some of these children live a life beyond your worse nightmare every day, and being human if you don't become the predator you will be the prey. There is not a man or woman on this job who wants to see a child die. Not even your worse racist, ignorant, loud or lazy ass dog. Give the coppers a break. Everyone on this blog is not the police, some are trolls, liars, instigators, some are just taxpayers paying their own salary.
Me.

9/09/2006 02:40:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Wow, that Suzy girl is a dynamo! Where did she find all the time and energy in her otherwise non-essential life to write this fiction and still build more cul de sacs along Austin Blvd. in the continuing effort to sequester Oak Parkers from the reality that lives in the 015th District? Your a fraud. And your stupid. Decent people fled Oak Park twenty years ago.

9/09/2006 05:17:00 PM  
Blogger coldtype said...

Cite...Site. I missed that one 11:04:54 you've earned a cold one. However, did you miss my point? I think you did.

9/09/2006 05:24:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Id be the frst to donate Suzy money to hire a lawyer and take you to task....YOU (SCC) allowed abuse and racism for months to run without any restraints...YOU should be held responsible. Id laugh my ass off if you ended up in litigation someday from this gossip site.

9/09/2006 08:47:48 AM
-------------------------------

Gossip, call it what you want, but really it's called freedom of speech, idiot.

9/09/2006 06:09:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

9/09/2006 11:19:54 AM

Ok bigshot, then why didn't you put your name on the header, oh hiding behind the anonymous, too. Don't be too fast on knocking down SCC when you yourself won't id who you are.

SCC gives a forum to speak, if you don't like it, don't sign on.

9/09/2006 06:16:00 PM  
Blogger Murphy40pct said...

08:47-I love how liberals claim to love the First Amendment except when it's used to voice opinions they don't like! You are an idiot!

11:19-Wow "tough guy." I doubt very much you've done much ass kicking in your career kid, so I'm pretty sure SCC will be okay. Do you even realize how dumb you sound anonymously challenging someone to a fight? Just email him your email address if you're such a big man-he won't post it, and I'm sure he'd be happy to make arrangements for that discussion...you just have to wonder why someone would waste his time talking to someone who is RETARDED.

9/09/2006 07:04:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Susy...we have a problem

9/09/2006 08:01:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Dear Slappy 9/09/2006 06:16:01 PM

The beef is between me and SCC he/she can look up my IP and have a face to face discussion anytime. Just like the old days.

9/09/2006 08:30:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

SCC cant be sent an email because the pussy hides behind this site and would post it for all the 2 year gel in the hair leather glove wearing college handjobs...he/she can find it if they want. Nothing personal just like the old days.

9/09/2006 10:31:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

PS Ive never been in a fight does the thumb go over or under the fingers....hope I dont get hurt. SCC and the rest of the college hires, have a great day....

9/09/2006 10:34:00 PM  
Blogger NorthSide said...

"And how did Suzy (sic) learn of this site? The retired sergeant sent her the information about comments posted." - 2:21 PM

If you are referring to me as the "retired sergeant", your statement is incorrect. At no time did I send any e-mail or other written communication to Susy Schultz or her colleague, Bill Dwyer. I did phone her on the morning of July 13. At no time in our polite conversation did I mention this blog site.

I later received an e-mail at my posted address from Mr. Dwyer. I did not respond, merely forwarding it to SCC.

Obviously, Susy Schultz and Bill Dwyer obtained this web site address from person(s) other than myself.

Austin, TX
No. 1 ranked OSU Buckeyes 24, Texas Longhorns 7.

9/09/2006 10:53:00 PM  
Blogger SCC said...

SCC cant be sent an email because the pussy hides behind this site

Um, Asshat? E-mail is where it's always been. On the profile page. Just because you can't find it doesn't mean it doesn't exist. Try again troll.

9/09/2006 11:04:00 PM  
Anonymous fkr said...

Dear Slappy 9/09/2006 06:16:01 PM

The beef is between me and SCC he/she can look up my IP and have a face to face discussion anytime. Just like the old days.

9/09/2006 08:30:09 PM


I'm not slappy either but I'm happy. Your beef is with SCC understood but are you not attempting to bait a break in on your own IP address. You do understand what I just said, right.

Good Nite

9/10/2006 01:17:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hey Daleyformccguest
9/09/2006 12:30:16 PM

Maybe a little ridicule might make her think twice the next time she decides to open her bleeding liberal heart. I'm not talking about some of the very nasty comments that were on here when it wasn't being moderated, but as you said, <"Do you want me to tell your family that they were fucking idiots or morons for letting the gypsy into their house to use the phone? Or that leaving the car doors unlocked is asking for a theft. Is that going to help the situation?">

YOUR DAMN RIGHT I WOULD WANT YOU TO SAY THAT!!

In fact, I'd rather say that to someone and excuse me if I hurt their feelings, but it's better to open their eyes to something they did that was stupid then to see their dead body laying somewhere.

9/10/2006 02:38:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Dear Stuart Smiley ... I mean Suzi ... you're good enuf ... you're smart enuf ... and, gosh darnit ... people like you!

except those austin shorties ....doh!

9/10/2006 04:38:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I have a problem talking to or listening to anyone who goes by the name of Suzy.

9/10/2006 07:48:00 PM  
Blogger DaleyforMCCguest said...

HA, HA.. Yes, I'm sure you would have no beef with me telling your mom or sister that she's a fucking idiot. I'm sure you would also zip me a message on the PDT to thank me for pointing out the error in their ways and possibly saving their lives. Yes, thats exactly what you would do. Me either. At least be honest with yourselves here. You would be calling me out before I finished the first sentence.

9/10/2006 08:55:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

9/10/2006 08:55:02 PM DaleyforMCCguest said....
HA, HA.. Yes, I'm sure you would have no beef with me telling your mom or sister that she's a fucking idiot.

>>>YOUR CORRECT, I WOULDN'T HAVE A BEEF WITH YOU. EXCEPT MAYBE FOR THE FACT YOU SAID, "FUCKING IDIOT."

I'm sure you would also zip me a message on the PDT to thank me for pointing out the error in their ways and possibly saving their lives.

>>>NOPE, I WOULDN'T BOTHER.

At least be honest with yourselves here.

>>>MY POST WAS HONEST, WHETHER YOU CHOOSE TO BELIEVE IT OR NOT IS ON YOU.

You would be calling me out before I finished the first sentence.

>>>LIKE I SAID ABOVE, I WOULDN'T BOTHER.

BTW...THERE ARE WAYS OF GETTING A POINT ACROSS TO SOMEONE WHO DID SOMETHING STUPID WITH PROFESSIONALISM AND TACTIFULNESS. CALLING SOMEONE AS YOU REFERRED TO, "A FUCKING IDIOT" PROBABLY ISN'T THE BEST WAY TO START OFF.

AS ALWAYS, STAY SAFE.

9/11/2006 12:10:00 AM  
Blogger DaleyforMCCguest said...

Then we're all good. BTW, the fucking idiot part was taken from the blog responses. Thats not what I would/have used for normal citizens in my examples, but my point stands that you wouldn't want any of the responses here for Suzies stupidity to be used for a family member.

9/11/2006 08:03:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

You guys are behind the curve. Suzy moved on to greener pastures about a month ago.

9/12/2006 08:52:00 PM  

<< Home

Newer Posts.......................... ..........................Older Posts