- Two newly released police reports in the controversial fatal shooting of 18-year-old Paul O’Neal differ in what they say about the teen’s actions while fleeing police.
Several police reports pertaining to the July 28 incident were released Friday to the Chicago Sun-Times. One officer in his report wrote that O’Neal “reached into his waistband” as he ran from officers.
That could indicate the officer believed O’Neal was reaching for a weapon. And yet, it is not repeated in any other officer’s report released Friday. The most detailed narrative in the documents released Friday is a major incident report that describes the pursuit of the stolen vehicle and the foot chase, but makes no mention of O’Neal reaching into his waistband.
Um, did you see the videos lady? The first two cops were up close and personal, almost getting hit by the Jaguar, flinging lead downrange, running to catch up to the wrecked cars. That's what their body-cam videos show - what else would it show? And the reports are reflective of that.
The third cop, the one involved in the head-on collision, his viewpoint is entirely different. He's attacked by a car flying at him, he can probably hear [police] bullets whizzing by, the driver flees between houses, over fences.His report is going to be completely different from the first two guys. Additionally, these cameras don't see through walls, and there doesn't seem to be a zoom feature.
Congratulations Sun Times, you proven that different people in different positions see different things from different viewpoints!
- A police tactical response report states: “Subject intentionally rammed his vehicle into RO’s vehicle while numerous shots were simultaneously heard coming from the direction of the offenders vehicle. During pursuit offender failed to comply to verbal commands while reaching into his waist band.”
However, a major incident notification omits any mention of the teen reaching into a waistband, which could have led police to fear a potential gun.
And? The Major Incident Notification Log is simply a summary of information known at the time so some boss can answer general media questions if there's a press conference somewhere. It isn't a TRR, it isn't a summary of an interview, it isn't even a Detective Supp.
Here's a small clue - complete information is seldom on a preliminary report.
And evidently, it's seldom found in media reports either - not when there's an agenda to be pushed.
Labels: media