FOP Meeting
While the investigation into misappropriation was "closed," all is not well at the Lodge. We got reports from a couple people this week regarding the Wednesday meeting:
- So at the union meeting last night, the crew was completely gas lighting the members . First [JC] stated that he will not discuss the subpoena on “advice of counsel." the $425 hour lawyer our dues are paying for . When [...] asked him are we still having to pay for his lawyer he said in a smug tone "Yes." Next was word salad where he said the “union “ was under investigation and that’s why we are paying for his lawyer
- A simple question was asked is John named in the subpoena and he said he would not answer . We are paying for his lawyer and we can’t get a straight answer on what the subpoena is about ? He also stated the US attorney got a “complaint “ and this is why they are asking for records.
So the union is under investigation? Then the membership deserves answers.
Is the president under investigation? Then the membership ought not be footing the bills.
- [JC]’s so confident that it’s all meritless and based on some sort of personal vendetta, he mentioned retaliating against whoever brought such an unsubstantiated allegation to the Feds, saying the person responsible needed to face consequences.
Um, whistleblower protections first of all. If there's retaliation, the membership better not be paying damages. Besides, that would be a civil matter, paid for by the aggrieved party, who (allegedly) is in such dire financial straits, he couldn't begin to pay those hourly rates, even with the union credit card.
And what's with the Board member in attendance being so drunk he couldn't give his report without staggering on stage and slurring his words so badly the audience couldn't understand portions?
The other guy drinking hard liquor on the rocks right up on stage?
Labels: FOP
.jpeg)







.jpeg)