Pay Raises?
Doesn't Conehead's budget have a hole in it? Like $700 million or something?
- (paywalled Tribune article) As Chicago’s 50 aldermen scramble to balance the city’s budget, they will have one new cost to pay for: raises they gave themselves.
Every member of the City Council elected to take the 2027 pay bump, according to budget documents. Meanwhile, Mayor Brandon Johnson decided to forgo it.
The widespread move to not opt out of the inflation-tied boost of around 2.3% sends the highest aldermanic salaries to $159,264, an amount 29 council members make. The lowest salary will sit at $128,892.
Conehead turned it down? Is he running for re-election or something? Trying to appear like a common man or something?
Altogether, the decisions by aldermen to give themselves raises will cost taxpayers almost $200,000 more, a minuscule amount compared with the $17.6 billion Chicago budget Johnson proposed for next year.
The move comes as many in the council blast Johnson for proposing new spending. In their calls for cost cutting amid financial challenges, some Johnson opponents have called on City Hall to reconsider similar raises given to thousands of city employees, a key reason the city spends more every year.
So the aldercreatures bitch about Conehead's new spending initiatives, claim he's irresponsibly spending everywhere else, and the gift him the opportunity to call them all hypocrites for taking optional pay raises while he turns his down.
Idiots.
Labels: money questions




