We had a comment last night in the post about how police actually saw an armed robbery taking place, but were ordered to not chase the criminals. It said something along the lines of (paraphrased):
- Thanks for showing that you support the criminals and have abandoned the honest citizens
As that ran afoul of Rule #9 posted on the right side main page, we deleted it. We didn't voice support of any such thing. What we said was:
- If it comes down to observing crime and writing paper versus a few years at 219 S Dearborn listing our assets before a judge, we'll be the best damn observer that the politicians and voters want us to be. We'll be gone soon anyway, and far away from here.
Then we went through our e-mail (thanks to everyone who writes by the way). Someone sent us two links about the NYPD, both dealing with the recent firing of a Police Chief.
Chief of what, you may ask?
A top chief who was in charge of the NYPD’s risk management bureau — and who expressed concern about the department’s massive surge in vehicle pursuits — was ousted last week by the newly appointed police commissioner, according to multiple sources.
Chief Matthew V. Pontillo, who served as chief of the Risk Management Bureau since 2021, ....
As the number of vehicle pursuits skyrocketed by nearly 600%, as THE CITY previously reported, Pontillo was critical of the aggressive practice, recently going so far as to flag 20 officers involved in such pursuits for additional training or supervision.
Comedy things first - a "Risk Management Bureau"? How the Hell didn't CPD steal this idea? We've been stealing borrowing NYPD policy since the days of Phil Cline, and we didn't grab this one? For f#$%s sake, we even took one of their top brass, got him a divorce and a stalker before he settled down, and we couldn't steal acquire a "Risk Management Bureau"????
We are sorely disappointed.
Now the serious part - a "Risk Management Bureau"? Are you f#$%ing kidding us? Go back and read that description of this jagoff's job:
- ...who expressed concern about the department’s massive surge in vehicle pursuits...
- ...was charged with identifying potential misbehavior and taking steps to prevent it...
- ...was critical of the aggressive practice, recently going so far as to flag 20 officers involved in such pursuits for additional training or supervision.
The second link is the old NYPD Rant.
New York is similar to Chicago in many ways - out of control crime, robberies/car jackings out the ass, thefts at every turn, taxpayers fleeing, businesses closing, illegals flooding social services....your basic democrat run shithole city. And in the middle of all this, you have a pencil pusher looking for cops who he thinks (or he has been told to think) are "too aggressive."
You know what we used to call those officers back in the day? The ones always in with an arrest or three, recovering hot cars and guns all over the District, Felony Court a couple times a week?
Behind their backs, we'd teasingly call them "shit magnets" but the fact is, they were good cops, doing good work, making good arrests. Now, there's an entire Bureau of the NYPD dedicated to stomping this trait out of their police officers. Read some more of this article:
- Pontillo also served as a liaison to the federal monitor installed in
November 2014 to address the NYPD’s unconstitutional implementation of
the policing tactic known as stop-and-frisk. In that capacity, he also
expressed concern over the NYPD’s new enforcement unit known as the
Community Response Team (CRT), the sources said, for operating with a
lack of transparency.
Ah...part of a federal monitor team! Hello Consent Decree people! And a CRT group??? See, CPD steals everything from NYPD! We just changed one letter!
The rest of the article outlines how crime, particular false registrations and unlicensed vehicles were terrorizing Big Apple citizens, so this CRT unit concentrated on enforcing actual laws...you know, those pesky things passed by the City Council. When enforcement got too effective, a boatload of officers were tagged for counseling and discipline for having the audacity of doing what they were hired to do.
Our anonymous (and now deleted) commentator who thinks we sided with the criminals?
- You elected "progressives"
- You bought into the "there's no such thing as a bad boy" narrative
- You probably even believed a nearly 18-year-study on racist CPD traffic stops that hasn't produced a single incidence of racial profiling
YOU abandoned US cupcake. Go play in traffic.
Maybe a hijacked Kia will run your dumb ass over.