Originally published at 1700 hours on 06 November 07. Bumped up to keep it near the top for a full day seeing as how much interest it's generatingJust for your edification, the Use of Force Model, based upon and actually
more restrictive than State Law as a "Preservation of Life" policy espoused by the Chicago Police Department (
you read that correctly - CPD policy is more restrictive than State Law):

If you notice the red and orange box near the bottom, it says TASER. If you follow that upwards you see it intersect with the boxes labeled "
Active Resister," "
Assailant... without weapons," and "
Assailant... likely cause serious injury." That means that a TASER can be lawfully and justifiably used in these circumstances.
Last time we googled "killed with a hammer," we got 1.9 million hits. See that dark red bar on the side of the graph that says "
Firearms and Other Lethal Force" and how it intersects with the top of the graph at "
Assailant... likely cause death or serious injury"? We'd say the officers used quite a lot of restraint in using the TASER option when simply killing her would have been completely justified. If you read the entire Use of Force model (
which you won't as it doesn't fit into your world view), you'll notice there isn't a single word regarding the elderly or the mentally ill - that's on purpose.
Your ignorant and blatantly anti-police article, especially when taking the police to task for acting completely within the scope of their duties and the law, belies an agenda the likes of which we have seen only in the deepest bowels of various fringe groups, both right and left.
This was a "Check the Well Being" call. The officers were confronted with a hammer wielding subject. The restraint shown by these officers is nothing short of heroic and you do no service by claiming that officers shouldn't have used the tool that spared this woman's life. You wanted them to use a stick, maybe a gang tackle? If grandma ended up with seven broken ribs and a shattered arm from that option, we're sure you'd be oh-so-understanding and wouldn't write that they should have used feather pillows and balloons to take a mentally ill woman into custody.
Fuck you Mope-rah. Fuck you and all your ilk who might someday make an officer hesitate to protect his or or her life and never make it home to their family. Just because your paper has decided to regularly ignore the political corruption that is bleeding this city dry and instead choose a bullshit target of convenience, despite the fact that everything was done within the rules, regulations, laws and policies of the City of Chicago and State of Illinois, makes you nothing but a hack writer, a shallow human being, and a shameful representative of minorities who strive to rise above the cult of victimhood you perpetuate.