- Bud Billiken Parade organizers on Sunday bemoaned local media focus on the shooting of two teenagers at the event instead of the celebration.
“It’s a shame to waste that time on a minor incident that occurred,” parade organizer Beverly Reed-Scott said at a news conference Sunday afternoon at the corner of 42nd Street and Martin Luther King Drive.
The parade, an end-of-summer celebration sponsored by Chicago Defender Charities, saw its first shooting Saturday in its 85-year history.
An 18-year-old man and a 17-year-old boy were shot while standing in the 4200 block of South King Drive along the parade route. Both victims survived and at least one was taken to Northwestern Memorial Hospital.
No arrests have been made in connection with the shooting.
Asked if she thought the media not covering violence would make a difference, Reed-Scott said: “Absolutely.
The article has been altered at least once, with a quote from aldercreature Dowell bemoaning the violence.
But let's get this straight:
- Allegedly, for the first time in 85 years, a shooting occurred at the Billiken parade - two wounded. We're supposed to believe in the face of all evidence to the contrary, that no violence has ever visited this joyous back-to-school parade before Saturday.
Our comment section is alive with stories of parade related violence (recent and past), including roving groups of 100-to-200 bangers that are just looking for fights with rivals. We can recall any number of firearm related offenses occurring within sight and sound of the parade and the after parties. Someone even mentioned the infamous Anthony Porter case. But the media and parade organizers want everyone who hasn't attended this miles-long-disaster to believe it's all fun fun fun. It isn't.
This reminds us exactly of the Taste violence - someone was killed within sight of the Taste a few years back and a tourist nearly caught a round in the head in his hotel room, but Shortshanks insisted the Taste was safe because none of this actually happened within the "boundaries."
In any event, the parade organizers are bemoaning the media coverage of this "first ever" event. Doesn't that by definition make it newsworthy? Should people know if something happens at an event like this so they can take proper precautions or make informed decisions?
Evidently not - Beverly Reed-Scott calls this "a minor incident" and thinks that not reporting the problem will make it go away. Two people with holes in their bodies is now "minor." Rahm even got in on the act, whining on WBBM Newsradio about how two people getting shot detracted from the positive message of getting ready for school.
Ummm, didn't we just have a 14-year-old killed by her former friend over a boy, another 13-year-old dope dealer gunned down and a 13-year-old girl at a slumber party stop a stray bullet? All that was news, but people getting shot at a parade isn't supposed to be covered? What if a 10-year-old had stopped one of those rounds? A 5-year-old? An infant in a stroller? Or grandma? Or great-grandma? If Rahm could just give us a window where we can say with confidence, "We don't care if this type of person got shot," then we're sure the media would jump at the chance to not cover this.
We can't help but view this as yet another lost opportunity. There is an epidemic of violence in the black community and ignoring it isn't going to change it. That hasn't worked in 50 years - witness the south and west sides. You aren't allowed to talk about violence in the black community unless you bad-mouth guns, blame other races, demand more money, jobs, spending and completely ignore the fact that someone aimed that gun, pulled that trigger and let a bullet go with no appreciation or second thought about where the lead ended up. That isn't a gun problem - that's a problem of someone who just doesn't give a fuck about anything because they haven't been taught to give a fuck about anything.
The media reported that some parade viewers started chanting, "Put down the guns." Those are the people who might actually get it on some level. But they aren't in charge and they are hopelessly outnumbered.
Labels: general, media