Why Not Record Teachers?
- Paul Boron is 13 years old. And he’s facing a felony eavesdropping charge that could change the course of the rest of his life. His story stands as another chapter of controversy surrounding an eavesdropping law some experts have criticized as ripe for abuse and misapplication.
On Feb. 16, 2018, Boron was called to the principal’s office at Manteno Middle School after failing to attend a number of detentions. Before meeting Principal David Conrad and Assistant Principal Nathan Short, he began recording audio on his cellphone.
Boron said he argued with Conrad and Short for approximately 10 minutes in the reception area of the school secretary’s office, with the door open to the hallway. When Boron told Conrad and Short he was recording, Conrad allegedly told Boron he was committing a felony and promptly ended the conversation. Two months later, in April, Boron was charged with one count of eavesdropping – a class 4 felony in Illinois.
Second, public school teachers and principals are public employees, right? And the big push is to record public employees in the performance of their duties, correct? The core argument is that if you performing a government function, then you have no expectation of any sort of privacy interacting with the public - police especially, but why not teachers, principals, building inspectors, aldercreatures, and dare we say it? Mayors.
At the very least, we'll have all sorts of proof in the event of false accusations against teachers, classroom attacks by students, and liberal indoctrination efforts.
Labels: we got nothing