- Testimony is proceeding faster than some anticipated. The prosecution could rest as early as Thursday. So far, jurors have heard from 21 prosecution witnesses over three days. Still on deck to testify is the state’s ballistics expert. If this brisk pace continues, the defense may begin its case Monday. Lead defense attorney Daniel Herbert promised the jury in his opening remarks that the defense would call experts to show Van Dyke’s use of lethal force was justified.
So far, the prosecution hasn't proven even the barest hint that racism played any part in this shooting, even though in opening statements they declared that it was sole motivating factor. This brings to the fore an interesting question that was e-mailed to us just last night:
- Is the prosecutor attempting to hang the jury?
Our letter writer expressed a thought that Herbert took the jury because Herbert thinks he can hang it based solely on the racial and personal backgrounds. Now the prosecution, after a lofty promise to pin this whole thing on racism, hasn't made a convincing argument to back it up. Is McMahon trying to hag the jury, too, knowing that Alvarez screwed up the charging?
The defense made some good points today pointing out that even the prosecution's "expert" couldn't determine what order the shots occurred and whether the "fatal shot" was fired first, third or sixteenth, nor if it was fired while the offender was upright.
And once again, Jesse Jackson had to add his .02 cents with his usual uneducated nonsense:
- After listening to hours of graphic courtroom testimony and viewing dozens of autopsy photos of McDonald’s injuries, Jackson said he was struck by how intentional Van Dyke was when he opened fire.
“Each shot drew blood,” Jackson told reporters.
So now Jesse wants the police to indiscriminately spray gunfire at offenders, with lead flying all over the place, wounding innocent passersby - you know, like Jesse's congregants do.
Labels: events